To: Mia T
I still don't get it. Where's the "racism" in that remark? I don't see anything either amusing or offensive in the comment. Can someone explain to me what the issue is? Because I don't see it. What am I missing?
4 posted on
01/11/2004 6:48:19 PM PST by
Lyford
To: Lyford
It wasn't funny.
As for its offensiveness and harmfulness, Gandhi's grandson disagrees with you.
Did you play the flash movies? Her ethnic stereotyping in public, in front of cameras and the press and about Gandhi, no less, was truly moronic; if you play the movie, you will see that after her initial ignorant comment, she actually continues to expand on it. This unreal obtuseness suggests a deeply ingrained bigotry.
If you play my Gandhi and ethnic slurs movies, you will see that my point really isn't the substance of the "joke" per se. Rather, it is to disabuse my fellow Jews and others of the absurd notion that, (notwithstanding all the evidence to the contrary), hillary clinton couldn't have said "f---ing Jew bastard" because, as her co-rapist husband had claimed, "hillary can't even tell a joke with an ethnic connotation."
9 posted on
01/11/2004 7:09:31 PM PST by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Lyford
I agree with you, it's niether "racist" nor "funny" HOWEVER what is truely offensive is the double standard exercised here. If Hillary had an (R) behind her name the liberls and democrats would be screaming for her scalp.
....I'd love to know what Trent Lott has to say about this.
31 posted on
01/12/2004 4:34:26 PM PST by
theyibby
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson