Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Looking for Diogenes
Let me address your point with a few questions:

Do you consider yourself a murder because someone makes you angry enough to want to kill them (but you do not)?

Do you consider yourself a rapist because some excites your sexual desire to the point of wanting have forcible intercourse (but you do not)?

Everyone who is not suffering from the condition of “homomorphism” is, by definition, a heterosexual. Heterosexuality is a condition of physical genital. That to which you are apparently referring as “homosexuality” is a behavior. If there is no physical deformity, nor any sodomy, the term “homosexuality” is meaningless in a practical sense.

The mere existence of an unacted-upon attraction to someone of the same sex does not make a person a sodomite.
67 posted on 01/11/2004 5:14:04 PM PST by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Lucky Dog
The mere existence of an unacted-upon attraction to someone of the same sex does not make a person a sodomite.

You are right. But it does make them a homosexual.

But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

78 posted on 01/11/2004 6:14:54 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson