Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucky Dog
Okay, let's have all gays in the military request discharge tomorrow. Oh, sh*t. We'd be in a situation 1000 times worse than when we canned the dozen or so gay translators who specialized in Arabic and Korean. The point is: the whole thing is just not practical. Military service has nothing to do with being gay. So let's get rid of the weird rules that make them seem related. S'all I'm sayin'.
59 posted on 01/11/2004 4:55:25 PM PST by Chief Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Chief Inspector
Who said we're in bad shape for "canning gay translators who specialized in Arabic and Korean," I contend we are better off for it. We will not be offending potentially valuable allies with such people who violate these allies' moral and legal codes.

Who told you it is not practical not to "can all of the gays" in military service? I submit that it is impractical not to do so. We have been doing it for at least half a century.

It appears that you have made up your mind and do not wish to be "confused with the facts," i.e., the fact that homosexual behavior is illegal in the military, the fact that breaking your oath is dishonorable, etc.
70 posted on 01/11/2004 5:21:18 PM PST by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson