'If however they took their endeavors elsewhere OFF base/pot and OFF duty (in this case duty hours) then their actions were in no way a viloation of their oaths because even military personnel have a personal and professional life, as long as the two remained seperate then there should be no criticism of their careers.'
Read the UCMJ, it is even older than the thread you resurrected. Got agenda?
Here's a kicker for ya, the UCMJ even states that sodomy is "any position" other then "missionary." That includes oral or other various forms of sexual behavior that most hetero/homo sexuals engage in. So if the UCMJ is the end all be all then I would venture to guess that there are thousands more in the services that are in violation. Or are we just picking and choosing which ones we will/wont follow???