Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Silence at school has parents talking
The State ^ | Jan. 11, 2004 | GINA SMITH

Posted on 01/11/2004 7:25:18 AM PST by Between the Lines

Meadowfield Elementary’s new quiet rule gets mixed reviews from parents, teachers

At Meadowfield Elementary School in Columbia, South Carolina, silence among students isn’t a preference — it’s a requirement.

When the school’s 600-plus students returned from winter break Tuesday, they couldn’t banter in the hallways or swap stories in the cafeteria, thanks to a new silence policy.

Instead, students read books while waiting for the school day to begin and listen to classical music in the school’s corridors and cafeteria.

The change has parents talking; some say the policy goes too far. They’ll discuss the new policy with school leaders at a meeting Monday.

“This is going overboard,” said Billy Smith, a father of two Meadowfield students. “I grew up talking to my friends during lunch and using those socialization skills. Kids need that.”

Smith and others say their children don’t like the policy either. It was all they could talk about when they got home.

A committee of parents and teachers came up with the idea to thwart bad behavior and inappropriate conversations among students.

“I don’t know why, but during the last few years, they (students) haven’t had as much control of themselves,” said Meadowfield teacher Lisa Curtis, who chaired the committee.

“Even parents were saying that it seems a little more chaotic in the halls. You could tell the climate was changing and we needed to change with it.”

So the group decided silence was the best policy.

But it’s not a permanent change.

If students do a good job of keeping mum, they’ll soon be allowed to whisper. They’ll also get lessons on what’s appropriate conversation for school.

“Not everyone knows what it means to whisper,” said Paula Stephens, the school’s principal. “But everyone knows what silence is. We’re starting with that as our baseline.”

Stephens argues the policy is not as restrictive as critics think. Lunch is only 20 minutes. And most schools require silence in the hallways, she said.

Eventually, Meadowfield will install a traffic light in the cafeteria. A green light will mean students can talk freely.

But it will change to a yellow warning light if the talk gets too loud.

And if students don’t get the message, the light will turn red, requiring silence.

For now, many of the teachers are loving the silence policy, Curtis said.

“It’s amazing how well it’s working,” she said. “The learning environment is better. The students are being more polite. There’s no bickering. I’m so proud of them.”

But some parents say it’s unfair punishment.

“I’m surprised at how inclusive the rule is,” said Lee Crabtree, mother of a Meadowfield fourth-grader. “What about the ones that do their work and behave appropriately in school? They’re being punished, too.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: education; monastery; shaddup; silentlunch; tickalock; vowofsilence; zipyerlip
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 01/11/2004 7:25:18 AM PST by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
In Germany they used to be called the brown shirts.
What nazi came up with this policy?
Simply let the kids be kids for goodness sake.
2 posted on 01/11/2004 7:28:28 AM PST by Joe Boucher (G.W. Bush in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Click!
3 posted on 01/11/2004 7:28:52 AM PST by Support Free Republic (If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
"But some parents say it’s unfair punishment.

“I’m surprised at how inclusive the rule is,” said Lee Crabtree, mother of a Meadowfield fourth-grader. “What about the ones that do their work and behave appropriately in school? They’re being punished, too.”

I'm in favor of the silence rule. If some parents like you Lee had been doing their job, this would not be necessary.

There should be an expectation of good and civil behavior in school. I wish my grade and secondary school education had this requirement.

4 posted on 01/11/2004 7:31:19 AM PST by sauropod (Graduate, Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
A committee of parents and teachers came up with the idea to thwart bad behavior and inappropriate conversations among students.

Everyone has their monitors... the difference is the Free Republic is voluntary, while the state forces attendance in their schools.

5 posted on 01/11/2004 7:33:21 AM PST by Mark was here (My fan club: "Go abuse some family member, as I'm sure is your practice." - Principled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Just doin' the kids a favor by gettn' 'em ready fer that new-fangled Campaign Reform.
6 posted on 01/11/2004 7:33:49 AM PST by jigsaw (God Bless Our Troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
I don't know, but I like it.
7 posted on 01/11/2004 7:34:18 AM PST by fml ( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
>>>>Instead, students read books while waiting for the school day to begin and listen to classical music in the school’s corridors and cafeteria.


Silence? Maybe.
Books? Sure!
But classical music? Are they NUTS?!
8 posted on 01/11/2004 7:35:27 AM PST by 4mycountry (If you're reading this tagline you have way too much time on your hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
We had to be silent going to lunch and before and after lunch. Once it was time to eat all hell broke loose (in a good way) We appreciated it when we could do something. Today kids can do anything at anytime. Where is the fun of "getting to do something?" Being silent isn't going to hurt them. We all need silence now and then. Certainly the teachers appreciate it I am sure and if the truth be know...there are probably a lot more students who like it than there are those who do not! Silenceis good for the soul now and then...even if you are a kid!
9 posted on 01/11/2004 7:40:13 AM PST by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
In Germany they used to be called the brown shirts.

They are called green skirts now.

What nazi came up with this policy?

The Catholic Church

Simply let the kids be kids for goodness sake.

They usually do when behaving. Heck, I got kicked out, twice (4th and 5th grades).

Ya, I know the school is public in the article. And no one is calling the Church a nazi.

8^)

5.56mm

10 posted on 01/11/2004 7:42:55 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
Ya=Yes

Sheesh. More coffee...or maybe not?

5.56mm

11 posted on 01/11/2004 7:45:19 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
I think it's GREAT! That's the way it was when I was in school 50 years ago. (we could talk in cafeteria but couldn't get up). Couldn't talk in class, study hall or homeroom. But we could study or read. Who's being punished. My kids had the traffic light in the cafeteria and that worked fine. Now my granddaughter (5 yrs old) has learned about male anatomy in the cafeteria.
12 posted on 01/11/2004 7:58:12 AM PST by NTegraT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines; SC Swamp Fox
They’ll also get lessons on what’s appropriate conversation for school

Appropriate according to who?

13 posted on 01/11/2004 8:05:21 AM PST by PistolPaknMama (pro gun Mother's Day 2004! www.2asisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
There should be an expectation of good and civil behavior in school

I totally agree, but we're talking about banning ALL behavior. These kids are expected to get through the day behaving as drones.

14 posted on 01/11/2004 8:08:28 AM PST by PistolPaknMama (pro gun Mother's Day 2004! www.2asisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Our schools have that cursed signal light in the lunch room. The school claims they want (not) parental involvement but a parent who eats lunch with their kids can't even visit because the lunch monitor is screaming to hush up and flashing the red light.

Kids can't be kids any more. They can't talk at lunch. They can't talk in class. They can't talk in the halls. They can't talk in the restrooms. The school has eliminated art, music, and even recess so when does a child learn to interact with others?
15 posted on 01/11/2004 8:11:41 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Well, there goes the argument that homeschoolers don't get to socialize because they don't go to public school.

If I had a kid in this school, I'd pull him out pronto.
16 posted on 01/11/2004 8:17:41 AM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
Public schools are set up for the benefit of the adults.
17 posted on 01/11/2004 8:20:05 AM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
They don't. Your school has turned into an employement center for teachers/administrators and a test center for kids -- the absence of art, music, and recess makes it easier for teachers to drill the kids for their high-stakes tests. High-stakes tests are important for school administrators because if students do poorly, administrators are penalized (might even lose their jobs).

It must be a joyless place to be. It probably won't be remembered fondly by its little inmates when they decide where they want their children to go to school. Bet they can't talk on the bus either.
18 posted on 01/11/2004 8:38:25 AM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
Darn, and I thought you were from Minnesota!

skepsel
19 posted on 01/11/2004 8:56:24 AM PST by skepsel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Bump!
20 posted on 01/11/2004 9:00:43 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson