Skip to comments.
INSPECTOR O'NEILL: THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF WMD
Drudge Report ^
| Jan. 11, 2004
| Drudge
Posted on 01/11/2004 6:10:06 AM PST by zook
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
I searched for another thread on this latest bit of nonsense and couldn't find one.
Let's see: Who do I trust? Colin Powell? Paul O'Neill? Colin Powell? Paul O'Neill? Gosh, that's a toughie! (Sarcasm off)
1
posted on
01/11/2004 6:10:07 AM PST
by
zook
To: zook
"Inspector O'Neill"
LOL!
2
posted on
01/11/2004 6:10:59 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
To: zook
The backstory behind how this book came to be written and published (by Simon & Shyster interestingly enough) ought to be checked out.
3
posted on
01/11/2004 6:11:42 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
23 |
Mississippi |
380.00
|
7
|
54.29
|
106
|
3.58
|
50.00
|
4
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
4
posted on
01/11/2004 6:12:02 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: RandallFlagg
O'Neill just can't seem to stop buying more rope.
5
posted on
01/11/2004 6:12:33 AM PST
by
zook
To: mewzilla
Maybe James Carville promised to be his friend.
6
posted on
01/11/2004 6:13:35 AM PST
by
zook
To: zook
How well does Suskind know Hilliary? Click
here to see why I ask.
7
posted on
01/11/2004 6:14:59 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: zook
Gotta love his timing, though.
He must not have gotten the memo about the blister agents found yesterday.
That's almost as bad as Gore endorsing Dean four days before Saddam's capture.
I can picture it now:
"Well, we haven't found any evidence that Saddam had ANYTHING that would constitute a WMD."
"But what about the blister agents found yesterday?"
"Wh-What??"
*thud*
8
posted on
01/11/2004 6:16:07 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
To: zook
I've said it before and I'll say it again.........
Paul O'Neill was and is irrelevant. Only the most angry of the RATS will find anything interesting in this.
We should not give O'Neill any attention in order to sink his book and his platform.
To: zook
Teel that to the Kurds.
To: zook
Maybe O'Neill is trying to position himself to be Clark's Sec of Treas, if Clark gets the nomination.
O'Neill's spew doesn't seem much different from Clark's.
11
posted on
01/11/2004 6:18:40 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Erik Latranyi
Oh, I think we should give O'Neill plenty of attention. And Suskind. And Simon & Shyster. The more light the better.
12
posted on
01/11/2004 6:18:48 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: zook
Shut the f up O'Neill you do not have a credible opinion.
To: Thom Pain
14
posted on
01/11/2004 6:19:40 AM PST
by
Thom Pain
(need more coffee, I guess.)
To: zook
INSPECTOR O'NEILLheh-heh How can they disrespect someone with a Smart Alec name who has the experience of inspecting the whole of Sub-Saharan Africa with one of the most distinguished rock stars of our time?
O'Neill/Bono Africa Tour
15
posted on
01/11/2004 6:22:24 AM PST
by
putupon
(Bad names and dirty words per CFR, Socialized Medications, and Amnesty for Illegals.)
To: zook
There was an earlier thread when this was 'developing'.. don't know if what O'Neill says is true or not.. but I do know that Clinton was lobbied to attack Iraq in '98..
16
posted on
01/11/2004 6:22:36 AM PST
by
Zipporah
(Write inTancredo in 2004)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Zipporah
Of course! As I put it in the other thread, who should we believe? Colin Powell? or Paul "Senile" O'Neill?
18
posted on
01/11/2004 6:25:11 AM PST
by
zook
To: zook
I know nothing of O'Neill.. other than what I've read in the last day or so...
19
posted on
01/11/2004 6:26:11 AM PST
by
Zipporah
(Write inTancredo in 2004)
To: zook
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/830817/posts
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Full Text, Sense of Congress - Remove Saddam
SEC. 3. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING UNITED STATES POLICY TOWARD IRAQ.
It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson