To: sauropod
Again, the neighbors have a responsibility to mitigate the damages which a neighbor inflicts upon them. Not complaining about the livestock, the crowded conditions, the loud music disturbing the peace, it all means that the neighbors didn't care enough about their property values to do anything about it. We do live in a self-governing society; we are not a bunch of serfs ruled by an elite class of overlords or some foreign occupation army. We are not all poor, helpless and hopeless victims of our fateful circumstances.
To: Cultural Jihad; Carry_Okie; AuntB
"Again, the neighbors have a responsibility to mitigate the damages which a neighbor inflicts upon them. "We do live in a self-governing society; we are not a bunch of serfs ruled by an elite class of overlords or some foreign occupation army."
But isn't that what you are proposing? Its called a homeowner association.
The people that destroyed the neighborhood should be legally and financially liable for the loss of value of their neighbors' property. AuntB has presented enough evidence that this indeed had occurred. This should be doable without the needed for neighborhood fascist homeowner's associations.
The neighbors should have sued for loss of value of their property and future income from the reduced value.
147 posted on
01/11/2004 1:48:43 PM PST by
sauropod
(Graduate, Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson