So you say. I cannot help but notice, however, that the question remains (!!!) unanswered.
There are but a limited number of interpretations one might reasonably draw from that. One is that you do not understand the question being asked. The other is that you are (for whatever reason) unwilling to answer it, in the same open spirit it was offered. I'm willing to be charitable, up to a point.
First of all, I have never called Dubya anything like that.
Gratifying, but irrelevant, unless you'd care to point out for me anyplace I stated you had said so. Exact lines, complete and in context, please.
Second, I reject your notion that conservatives call Dubya that.
"Reject" all yoyu like, as best pleases you. The myriad pinheaded postings to that effect are littered throughout this very board, and speak for themselves. Go through the lengthier immigration-related threads, and start reading.
And yes, it is worse what MoveOn is doing.
Still waiting for the "why" on this one. Presumably, said answer will be arriving sometime between five minutes from now and the end of the world.
She does have authoritarian tendencies, of that there is no doubt.
But "Hitlerian?"
Well, that's a trick question. Certainly there have been many posters here who have done so, such as placing images of President Bush with a Hitlerian moustache, while jumping onto the DU-approved anti-immigration reform bandwagon. But whether those who advocate or support or excuse libertarianism, moral-liberalism, social-Darwinism, abortion, bigotry against any or all religions, corruption in the populace, policies which destroy the family, cop-killing, tax-cheating, and theft of intellectual property are really conservatives is open to debate.