Skip to comments.
All fired up about space proposal (California Aerospace Industry revival ahead?)
OC Register ^
| 1/10/04
| Chris Knap
Posted on 01/10/2004 10:24:37 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Reports about a new U.S. agenda for manned space travel sent aerospace stocks climbing Friday and brought back a wave of nostalgia for the '60s and '70s, when everything from rockets to space capsules were built in Southern California and even the cars were styled like spaceships.
(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: areospace; firedup; industry; proposal; space
To: NormsRevenge
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Boeing and Lockheed are the natural participants in a new space initiative they are the primary contractors. But it would also bring a longer-term invigoration to the whole space industry. I think this is a long-term picture maybe 20 years but one that could prove very beneficial to these companies," Arment said.
Which is the answer to everyone who says that no one benefits from the space program. I'm guessing that in the absence of the US Space Programs, plastic would probably remain a little known chemical substance that was manufactured by Imperial Chemical. Manufactured primarily In Great Britain, rather than in the United States.
2
posted on
01/10/2004 10:35:48 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(The Return of The King - Joe Gibbs Coaches Again!)
To: All
|
He Pledges his Allegiance to the Left
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
01/10/2004 10:36:32 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
To: NormsRevenge
If we're going to get the most bang-for-our-buck in the Space Program, then I don't see it being located in California much longer. Apart from Goldstone, everything else should be relocated to less expensive, more business-friendly states. I don't think any boom from the space race should be used as a tax revenue vector to prop up all the programs for Illegals out here.
4
posted on
01/10/2004 10:54:52 AM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
To: .cnI redruM
Which is the answer to everyone who says that no one benefits from the space program. I'm guessing that in the absence of the US Space Programs, plastic would probably remain a little known chemical substance that was manufactured by Imperial Chemical. Not to mention that micro- and mini-computers would have taken much longer to come to market. The Apollo program drove the need for smaller computers.
5
posted on
01/10/2004 11:01:43 AM PST
by
Prime Choice
(Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
To: All
Guns, butter, and Space. Not the 1960s again?! What did the "greatest generation" of W.W.II do first?
"In my view, the stakes are much higher in the war on terror than in anything we've faced since World War II, and probably World War II as well," Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard Myers.
To: NormsRevenge

Rocketdyne - Fifty years of playing with fire.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson