Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
So the states legislatures are free to compromise the security and freedom of it's citizens, and the federal government has no interest, power, authority or responsibility to prevent it - the security and freedom of the individual states is unrelated to the security and freedom of the nation?
188 posted on 01/12/2004 7:50:34 AM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
"So the states legislatures are free to compromise the security and freedom of it's citizens,"

"Free to compromise?" Well they could try, I suppose.

First, it would have to be constitutional. Second, they'd have to have the consent of the governed, otherwise the legislation will never pass.

"and the federal government has no interest, power, authority or responsibility to prevent it "

Wow, I thought you'd be the last one to want federal interference in a state's business.

"the security and freedom of the individual states is unrelated to the security and freedom of the nation?"

Sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about.

189 posted on 01/12/2004 8:05:53 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson