Society has a right to impose reasonable restrictions. Always had.
Don't tell me that the private possession of property cannot be prohibited. It can and is.
A reasonable restriction of the right of free speech is you can't slander someone.
A reasonable restriction on the right to keep and bear arms is that you can't shoot someone just for the fun of it. It doesn't mean the government can decide that the right doesn't really mean anything which is the current state of affairs.
"Your elected representatives in Congress concluded that an individual growing, manufacturing, trading, selling, bartering, ... whatever, illegal drugs wholly within that individual's state, has an effect on interstate trafficking (commerce). Obviously, I agree, as I think most rational people would --- "
I Paraphased:
--- Your elected representatives in Congress concluded that an individual manufacturing, trading, selling, bartering, ... whatever, 'illegal' weapons wholly within that individual's state, has an effect on interstate trafficking (commerce). Obviously, I agree, as I think most rational people would ---
You can't have it both ways kiddo.. -- the private possession of property like guns, booze, drugs, cigarettes, etc; ---- cannot be prohibited.
-- Their public usages can be reasonably regulated, but only under our BOR's protections.
Stop paraphrasing my words and taking them out of context. Last warning.
Or what? Are you gonna take your marbles home?
Society has a right to impose reasonable restrictions. Always had.
Yep, I just made that clear [boldly] above. -- Read much?
Don't tell me that the private possession of property cannot be prohibited. It can and is.
Of course it is.. Working to end such prohibitions is one of FR's goals.
You don't like being told that?
Leave..