On the contrary, that's what the Young-Earth-Creationists do - rejecting all evidence, questioning the obvious, inserting impossible (non)explanations. Just like you do.
If a person is willing to consider the possibility that God is, he can then examine the evidence for that possibility. And if he does so, he is very likely IMHO to determine that God not only is, but He has a lot of answers to our questions.
Yes, Krishna answers our questions, but, since he is such a tricky god, are they the correct answers?
Your conceit about a particular god, a particular religion, or a particular sect is neither unique nor informative. At this point, it's just boring.
No they are not. Krishna is an imaginary God made up in men's minds. If you listened carefully to Krishna's answers, you would see the contradictions.
Your conceit about a particular god, a particular religion, or a particular sect is neither unique nor informative. At this point, it's just boring.
So sorry to have bored you. But is your conceit that all religions are equally invalid, an assumption, an excuse or a well thought out position? Because if you are wrong, and there is a God, you no doubt will be called upon to answer for your decision.