To: MizSterious
A guy like O'Neill must have a history of backstabbing and disloyalty--I doubt this is his first "hit."Is it backstabbing and disloyality IF it is factual?
To: joesbucks
So the Bush Adminsitration had contingency plans to invade Iraq.
And the Clinton Administration didn't?
O'Neil is a complete moron
79 posted on
01/10/2004 7:33:14 AM PST by
Rome2000
(Ban "Jihad", not smoking)
To: joesbucks
Try again, joesbucks (are you working for Dean or something?). It is backstabbing if he is trumping up the contingency plans that are always drawn up, and trying to make it look like something else. It is indeed backstabbing if he is revealing state secrets (at least one of the documents were so marked). The Party of Treason is becoming quite adept at "leaking" secret documents, thereby living up the title given to them by Lincoln.
89 posted on
01/10/2004 7:41:45 AM PST by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: joesbucks
Is it backstabbing and disloyality IF it is factual?without question
To: joesbucks
...Is it backstabbing and disloyality IF it is factual?...
How can blind man in a room of deaf people be factual?
210 posted on
01/10/2004 11:56:02 AM PST by
Joe_October
(Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson