To: Tumbleweed_Connection
in the first three months of 2001, the administration was looking at military options for removing Saddam Hussein from power and planning for the aftermath of Saddam's downfall, including post-war contingencies like peacekeeping troops, war crimes tribunals and the future of Iraq's oil Wait a second, the left told me for months that there was no post-Iraq plan.
This is simply more indication that Bush's plans on Iraq were practically a seamless continuation of Clinton's policy and the near-unanimous opinion on Saddam held in Washington.
To: Monti Cello
that Bush's plans on Iraq were practically a seamless continuation of Clinton's policy Why suddenly is the Clinton administrations plans so dead on when they were so wrong while he was in office?
To: Monti Cello
"the administration was looking at military options for removing Saddam Hussein from power and planning for the aftermath of Saddam's downfall, including post-war contingencies like peacekeeping troops, war crimes tribunals and the future of Iraq's oil" Wait a second, the left told me for months that there was no post-Iraq plan.
Isn't that something?
I wonder how the press determines when to quit pushing one leftist claim and start pushing a contradictory leftist claim?
They probably just trust the DNC to know.
125 posted on
01/10/2004 8:12:30 AM PST by
mrsmith
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson