Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Real Message of The Bush Amnesty
The American Conservative ^ | 1/9/2004 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 01/09/2004 12:56:02 PM PST by JohnGalt

Real Message of The Bush Amnesty

by Pat Buchanan

If George Bush’s amnesty for between 8 million and 14 million illegal aliens is enacted, you can kiss the old America goodbye.

Consider what the president is saying with his amnesty. He is telling us that he cannot or will not do his constitutional duty to defend the states from invasion. He is saying that he simply cannot or will not protect our borders or enforce our immigration laws. He is saying he will no longer send illegal aliens back.

Not long ago, this would have produced calls for impeachment and cries that, “If Bush won’t enforce our laws, let’s elect a president who will.”

By offering amnesty and residency to millions who broke in line, broke our laws and broke into our country, Bush is not only rewarding wholesale criminality, he proposes to legalize it.

His amnesty will send this message to the world: the candy store is open, and the Americans cannot protect it. Now is the time to bust in.

As there must be billions of people willing to come and work for a fraction of our minimum wage—and exploit our social safety net—the number who could come under the Bush guest-worker program is almost infinite.

Imagine a car wash that employs 40 African-American, Latino, and white working-class folks at $8 an hour each. A new car wash down the street opens up, offering 40 new jobs at $5.15 an hour. No Americans apply. Under Bush’s proposal, that employer would be free to go to Asia, Africa, and Latin America, round up workers, and bring them in.

The new car wash with its foreign workers then drives the old car wash with its American workers out of business. Taxpayers are then forced to subsidize the newly unemployed—and pay for the medical care, food stamps, rent supplements, welfare, and schooling of all the new immigrants and their families, provide legal services when they get in trouble and pay for more cops to police their neighborhoods.

And every child born of a guest worker would, under our 14th Amendment, become an American citizen, automatically entitled to all the benefits of citizenship. Meanwhile, Bush’s amnesty will do nothing to halt the illegal invasion that continues to this hour. If you would know what America’s social, cultural, and fiscal future will look like, take a ride through Los Angeles, capital of Mexifornia.

But why did President Bush pick now to propose as explosive an idea as amnesty, when it seemed he was holding a winning hand on the issues of taxes, national security, the economy, and gay marriages?

One sees here the cynical ploy of “Boy Genius” Karl Rove. With the filing deadlines for the Republican primaries having passed and no GOP opponent, with no Third Party challenger from the Right, and with Dean the likely Democratic nominee, Rove knows conservatives are boxed in. In the old cliché, “The conservatives have nowhere else to go.”

So Rove is executing an “apertura a sinistra,” an opening to the Left, pandering to Hispanics and Mexican President Vicente Fox, to whom Bush is to pay a visit.

But Rove may be too clever for the president’s good. For there is no hard evidence that Hispanics, other than those militants who detest Republicans, are demanding amnesty. And with Bush’s spending on foreign aid soaring, his deficits rising, and the White House refusing to veto a single spending bill, Rove & Co. may have stretched conservative loyalty to the breaking point.

For some conservatives, this amnesty will snap it. They may just get on their hind legs and fight, for huge majorities have repeatedly registered opposition to any amnesty for illegal aliens. How is the president helped by a bloody battle with his political base in an election year?

Half a century ago, Dwight Eisenhower, informed there were a million illegals in the United States, most of them from Mexico, ordered them sent back. The project was called “Operation Wetback.”

Ike was a strong president. But in George W. Bush, we have a leader unwilling to pay the political price of doing his duty and enforcing the immigration laws of his country because he fears the reaction from the media elite and Mexican-Americans.

When it comes to standing up to truly powerful ethnic lobbies—the Hispanic Lobby, the Cuban-American Lobby, the Israeli Lobby—Bush wilts and folds every time. Nor is it a healthy sign for the future of our republic when its president offers an amnesty to law-breakers, rather than doing his painful duty to protect his country from what has now become an unstoppable foreign invasion.

The real threats to America’s survival do not come from the Sunni Triangle. They come from within, and unfortunately we have a president who either does not understand them or will not look them in the face.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aliens; crimepays; culturewar; illegalaliens; illegals; immigration; lawlessness; linecutters; nationalsuicide; notwhatinvasionmeans; patbuchanan; patisabeaner; rewardingcriminals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-248 next last
To: PRND21
You'll have to move.

Move? I don't think so.

It will happen without you.

You bet, if it happens, I wont be an accomplice to it.

161 posted on 01/09/2004 3:28:29 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

Comment #162 Removed by Moderator

To: westerfield
That's my whole problem with it, nothings changed. Rewarding those who came here illegally while making everybody else who have been patiently waiting in line jump thru hoops just strikes me as bad policy, not to mention unfair to those who have played by the rules.

But, given the fact that we could never stop people from coming across the border from the south, the only fair thing is to end the silly hoops for people coming here from virtually anywhere.

Open the borders to all healthy people who aren't crooks.

That's not to say we should allow them to get wealfare, but if they come here to work, let them.

163 posted on 01/09/2004 3:30:13 PM PST by narby (McGovern lost in 72 - and launched the left's takover of the Dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: !1776!
"What we have right now is that there's no incentive for capital expentiture on technology in these jobs as its cheaper to hire a bunch of illegals to do the job, and in particular the crop production industries (apples, lettuce, etc). I also agree here. Personell costs are a strong driving force behind technological advances that reduce costs through automation and increased productivity. "

Yes, but cheaper for who? Cheaper for the employer, yes. But don't forget that little thing you learned in Econ 101 about Externalities!

Somebody else will pay those costs!

164 posted on 01/09/2004 3:31:12 PM PST by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan
If Pat is against it, it must be a really good idea then.

Lets see, Pat Buchanan is against it and the likes of Loretta Sanchez are all for it.

Interesting to see who some of you stand with.

165 posted on 01/09/2004 3:31:23 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Pat is right.
166 posted on 01/09/2004 3:31:48 PM PST by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
Most people would believe that a President sworn to uphold the law would mean that he was going to enforce the law. What he actually has done is failed to uphold the law.

I don't remember his exact policy positions, but I remember distictly understanding that his goal was to change the laws, not enforce the un-enforcable laws we now have.

167 posted on 01/09/2004 3:32:24 PM PST by narby (McGovern lost in 72 - and launched the left's takover of the Dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: narby
He did try and handle this in 2001, in a way that he had talked about during the election of 2000. But the hints of a policy change that were communicated in early Sept 2001 got sidetracked a bit on 9/11.

Which is rather awkward because 9/11 called for a serious policy change, enforcement of our laws. Bush's 2000 agenda evidently didnt fit in with the right thing to do. So we have a war on terror with the borders wide open and no leadership on this issue. Now we have Fox telling us his plans for America.

168 posted on 01/09/2004 3:33:04 PM PST by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: narby
Just learn English, join the American culture, and become one of us

That is the real essense of the problem we face. We could survive the mass immigration from one single defunct culture if we didn't have the enemy within trying to destroy our way of life.

We can not survive both. Simultaneously.

169 posted on 01/09/2004 3:33:26 PM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: narby
Open the borders to all healthy people who aren't crooks.

Good grief, you can't possibly be serious, we would be overwhelmed with immigrants from Mexico and every other third world country. You must be one of those open border libertarian types to suggest such a thing.

170 posted on 01/09/2004 3:36:03 PM PST by westerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
My bad on 106. Linda Chavez and not Linda Sanchez. Unfortunately, Linda Sanchez is my congressional rep. (sigh)
171 posted on 01/09/2004 3:36:14 PM PST by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: narby
But, given the fact that we could never stop people from coming across the border from the south, ,

Pre-1986 we have 300k illegals. Amnesty brings in 3million. Now we have 12 million. There has been a rather large difference in the degree of the problem recently. It seems to revolve around amnesty. That happens to be why people are pissed about amnesty right now.

172 posted on 01/09/2004 3:38:46 PM PST by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: PuNcH
So we have a war on terror with the borders wide open and no leadership on this issue.

Come on. Going after someone who wants to pick beets has nothing in comon with going after someone who wants to commit mass murder.

As for "borders wide open". I took a tour of the Checkpoint Charlie museum in Berlin a few months ago. It's quite obvious that if someone want's to get across a border, they're going to find a way to do it.

The way to stop both illegal immigration AND terrorism, is on the streets. Hopefully, streets outside the US.

173 posted on 01/09/2004 3:40:06 PM PST by narby (McGovern lost in 72 - and launched the left's takover of the Dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Pat Buchanan is an idiot. Loretta Sanchez is also an idiot. But Loretta is too stupid to know what Bush's proposal really means...she thinks it means amnesty.
174 posted on 01/09/2004 3:43:13 PM PST by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: PuNcH
Pre-1986 we have 300k illegals. Amnesty brings in 3million. Now we have 12 million. There has been a rather large difference in the degree of the problem recently. It seems to revolve around amnesty. That happens to be why people are pissed about amnesty right now.

I disagree. I think the difference is the "critical mass" of mexicans in particular places.

When I was in the Air Force, I stuck pretty much on-base when I was stationed in Germany. I listened to Armed Forces radio, and watched AF TV.

My point is that once a critical mass of illegal mexicans, being taught in mexican in school and seeing mexican on TV is hit, THEN the floodgates open.

Bottom line, they got here and stayed here easily before amnesty, and they still do. Amnesty was meaningless.

175 posted on 01/09/2004 3:44:33 PM PST by narby (McGovern lost in 72 - and launched the left's takover of the Dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: westerfield
Good grief, you can't possibly be serious

LOL! Frightening isn't it?

176 posted on 01/09/2004 3:44:59 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Good point, and is probably why the Kennebunkportians of this world are all for this amnesty: they don't live in the real world that the blue collars inhabit. They're not going to be affected by this as their own salaries won't go down, but they'll reap the benefits of cheaper services.

What are all these potential fruit pickers and hotel maids doing now? This isn't a question of Americans being unwilling to do these jobs it's a question of Americans doing other things. You could hiring them away with fantastic salaries for fruit picking but you'd have fewer people working for more money and that would result in fewer businesses. You also wouldn't be using the skills that most blue collar and white collar workers have.

177 posted on 01/09/2004 3:46:02 PM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #178 Removed by Moderator

To: Ohioan
You write good stuph!
179 posted on 01/09/2004 3:47:34 PM PST by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: narby
Come on. Going after someone who wants to pick beets has nothing in comon with going after someone who wants to commit mass murder.

We could just as easily say that the vast vast majority of middle easterners are here to work. Even those that have broken the rules on immigration.

The way to stop both illegal immigration AND terrorism, is on the streets. Hopefully, streets outside the US.

The terrorists have already displayed several times that they are on our streets too. The point isnt just about the border itself but cleaning up the illegal problem as well.

180 posted on 01/09/2004 3:47:51 PM PST by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson