To: r9etb
Too true.
I would say he killed it because he brought them to the so-far irreversible point of selling their soul. They had to decide between the slightest, meagerest remnants of decency, principle, and morality or just power.
And we know what they chose.
Dan
62 posted on
01/09/2004 1:31:06 PM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
I would say he killed it because he brought them to the so-far irreversible point of selling their soul. They had to decide between the slightest, meagerest remnants of decency, principle, and morality or just power. I don't know ... I can't help but think that the underpinnings of the problem really are sexual. For Clinton, I'm almost certain that this is true -- if you look at his methods, they can only be described as attempts at seduction.
And the Democrats come across as those poor hapless women who end up with jerks who they latch onto out of some passing fancy, and stay with them because they hope against hope that this indiscretion will be the last.
65 posted on
01/09/2004 1:38:02 PM PST by
r9etb
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson