Posted on 01/09/2004 12:20:07 PM PST by FlyLow
In the best of all possible worlds, our nation's borders would be airtight, immigration would be meticulously monitored, countries of origin would be cooperative, and worker supply and demand would be in perfect lock-step.
Alas, this is not the best of all possible worlds.
In a move that may ultimately define the Bush administration's domestic policy as much as the war on terror has defined its policies abroad, the White House announced plans Wednesday for massive revisions in U.S. immigration laws. The administration is calling the series of immigration reform proposals a "temporary worker program," designed "to match willing foreign workers with willing U.S. employers when no Americans can be found to fill the jobs."
The plan, if adopted by Congress, will allow undocumented, illegal immigrants residing in the United States to obtain a legal work status for three years, with options to renew, and to apply for permanent residence status or citizenship. The plan also offers workers incentives to return to their countries of origin following the end of their work permit in the U.S. The program, the administration says, "would allow workers who currently hold jobs to come out of hiding and participate legally in America's economy while not encouraging further illegal behavior."
In other words, the program will forgive past criminality in order to deter future criminality. (Stay with us here, fellow Patriots, as we try to make some sense of this.)
Mr. Bush emphasizes that this is not an amnesty plan, because the program does not grant permanent resident status or a citizenship track to illegal immigrants. (That's debatable.) Instead, says Mr. Bush, it grants temporary work permits to alleviate this widespread illegal influx into the U.S. "I oppose amnesty, placing undocumented workers on the automatic path to citizenship. Granting amnesty encourages the violation of our laws and perpetuates illegal immigration," the President said. "America is a welcoming country, but citizenship must not be the automatic reward for violating the laws of America."
In the 48 hours since the announcement, the Bush immigration-reform plan has met with vehement resistance from every band of the political spectrum. Indeed, a sizeable majority of Americans are opposed to any expansion of existing immigration, or any legitimization of existing illegal aliens. While a great deal of this reticence was anticipated, and some of it justified, a number of qualifications on the issue of immigration reform must be brought to light.
First, this is not a new issue. Following a February, 2001, meeting between President Bush and Mexican President Vicente Fox, a U.S.-Mexico High Level Working Group on Migration was established. This group would be tasked with addressing the problem of illegal immigration from Mexico to the U.S., which is estimated to compose more than 60% of all such immigration into the U.S. On September 6, 2001, the U.S. and Mexico agreed to "match willing workers with willing employers" and "ensure migration takes place through safe and legal channels." Five days later, of course, the discussion of immigration reform, border policies and economic integration would come to an abrupt halt with the terrorist attacks of 9/11.
Second, the Bush plan is, in part, politically timed and motivated. With the ascendancy of Arnold Schwarzenegger, California will likely be hotly contested in the upcoming presidential race. As such, the Hispanic vote will become critical to either party's hopes of carrying the Golden State -- and its treasure trove of 54 electoral votes. Should President Bush carry California, his re-election would be assured. However, when seen alongside a strong economic recovery and significant progress in the war on terror, California is not essential to the President's prospects.
Consequently, charges of "hispandering" don't stand up to scrutiny. Rather, the Bush immigration-reform plan should be seen as a first step toward the more substantive reform we anticipate after this election cycle. Even congressional proponents of the measure do not anticipate a bill to pass in 2004, indicating that the Bush team is using this occasion to gauge and build public support for farther-reaching reform beginning in 2005 with the President's second term.
Third, and perhaps most significantly, immigration reform should not be confused with the issue of border security. Rather, the proposed plan is designed to deal with current realities: Millions of illegal immigrants already live in the U.S., and millions more will push across our borders unless circumstances change. The President's reform plan is designed to curb illegal immigration and also includes an initiative to improve border -- and hence homeland -- security. Essentially, any nation wishing to participate in the temporary-worker program will also be required to stem further illegal immigration from its own country.
Fourth, while such an immigration policy may be blamed for stealing jobs from American citizens, this is simply not the case. The Bush plan stipulates that in order for a worker to participate in the program, the prospective employer must make a reasonable effort to ensure that a U.S. citizen is not available to fill the job. Simply put, American workers come first. In almost every case, illegal immigrants in the U.S. are doing jobs that American citizens are either unwilling or unavailable to perform. In reality, immigrant labor -- both legal and illegal -- forms an important underpinning to the whole of the American economy. The new plan will remove hindrances for employers eager to hire and immigrant workers eager to work. Also, the administration's plan emphasizes the need to increase enforcement against companies that break the law and continue to hire illegal (unregistered) workers.
Fifth, the administration's plan does not reward illegal immigrants with citizenship, nor does it place illegal workers ahead of legal immigrants who have lawfully sought to obtain a green card or citizenship.
Summing up, the plan is intended to confront the realities of illegal immigration. Illegal immigrants are in the U.S. now -- between 8 million and 14 million of them, according to various estimates. Simply by being here, these illegals benefit from a wide array of social services at the local, state and federal levels; they do not, however, pay taxes on their earnings. A temporary-worker program like that proposed by the Bush administration will channel this immigrant labor into the tax base, rather than permitting it to siphon off government resources.
A closing thought: President Bush was formerly Governor Bush -- of Texas. Mr. Bush is thus well acquainted with issues of migration and border control. In the same vein, the sponsors of similar legislation in Congress are two representatives and a senator from another border state, Arizona. In other words, the proposed temporary-worker program has its origins are among those who will be affected most of all.
| Rank | Location | Receipts | Donors/Avg | Freepers/Avg | Monthlies | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Massachusetts | 370.00 |
12 |
30.83 |
261 |
1.42 |
135.00 |
9 |
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
Ridiculous. The government cannot enforce current laws requiring that workers be legal. How would they enforce this? In any case corporation will simply lower wages to the minimum wage to ensure no Americans are willing to take them. What happens to supply and demand in the labor market when there is an unlimited supply of labor?
In other words it agrees with your opinion that Bush is correct on this issue.
Too true. What's going to stop these guys from pulling the quick fade and disappearing once they get their guest worker status and are here in this country? Especially when in many jurisdictions local authorities can't turn over illegals to the Feds because the Feds don't want them on their hands?
House Version Sponsored by Tom Tancredo of CO
Senate Version Sponsored by John Cornyn of TX
Tancredo's plan puts the military on the border until we can train enough border patrol, increases the border patrol and detention centers, ends the "anchor child" problem, increases penalties and bonds and much more.
We need to forget about Bush's plan and get on the Tancredo bandwagon by writing our Congress-critters!
The one question I have is whether Europeans and Africans will have equal footing in getting these jobs that Americans don't want.
Probably through complaints to the government against an employer or shut out Americans suing employers.
And mine. But of course we could take an approach different than Bush's in trying to fix a longtime problem, we could do nothing as usual except wring our hands and complain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.