Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

W-w-wait a minute with your temporary work plan, Mr. President!
AmeriConservative ^ | 8 January 2004 | Dennis Durband

Posted on 01/09/2004 10:46:32 AM PST by Spiff

W-W-WAIT A MINUTE WITH YOUR TEMPORARY WORKER PLAN, MR. PRESIDENT!

By Dennis Durband

Disgusting. Unacceptable. Pathetic. Pandering.
 
That pretty well sums up how most conservatives feel about President Bush's latest sellout -- a Temporary Worker Program for border lawbreakers.
 
This is not the time for conservatives to feel as if we're backed into a corner and have no alternatives come November. The worst thing we can do is to say we'll vote for Bush anyway because we have no good alternatives.
 
This is the perfect opportunity for conservatives to make our voices heard. What's our message?
 
The guest worker program is unacceptable. Our vote is up for grabs. We cannot support a president who, despite doing well on tax cuts, wiping out terrorists and supporting the sanctity of life, has failed miserably on education, the border invasion and campaign finance reform. We have alternative candidates to consider. That will shake itself out in time. For now, let's do an in-depth examination of the president's Jan. 7th speech. I'll run some of his quotes in italics below and then follow with my reactions:
 
The Temporary Worker Program

I appreciate the members of Congress who have taken time to come: Senator Larry Craig, Congressman Chris Cannon, and Congressman Jeff Flake. I'm honored you all have joined us, thank you for coming. Every generation of immigrants has reaffirmed the wisdom of remaining open to the talents and dreams of the world. And every generation of
immigrants has reaffirmed our ability to assimilate newcomers -- which is one of the defining strengths of our country.
 
DD: Yes, Mr. President, you said it yourself: "immigrants." Since when it is our role as presidents and residents to assimilate lawbreaking border invaders who repeatedly thumb their noses at our laws and eat up our resources?
 
During one great period of immigration -- between 1891 and 1920 -- our nation received some 18 million men, women and children from other nations.
 
DD: And, Mr. President, you might be interested in knowing that those immigrants came here under the authority of American law. They were legal immigrants. Today's gatecrashers are not legal immigrants. We have not "received" them; they have come here on their own accord with no invitation or legal standing.
 
One of the primary reasons America became a great power in the 20th century is because we welcomed the talent and the character and the patriotism of immigrant families.
 
DD: Mr. President, I seriously question the patriotism of many of these Reconquestas and La Raza's.
 
The contributions of immigrants to America continue. About 14 percent of our nation's civilian workforce is foreign-born.
 
DD: Mr. President, we citizens demand the prosecution of any and all human resource and administrative representatives of companies who knowingly hire illegals. We demand and expect full cooperation with the Department of Labor on this.
 
Many immigrants also start businesses, taking the familiar path from hired labor to ownership.
 
DD: And many illegal border crashers close down businesses like hospitals.
 
As a Texan, I have known many immigrant families, mainly from Mexico, and I -
 
DD: Mr. President, we must insist that you discontinue the disingenuous blurring of the distinction between legal immigrants and illegal border invaders. Do you take us for idiots, sir?
 
They bring to America the values of faith in God, love of family, hard work and self reliance -- the values that made us a great nation to begin with.
 
DD: But the people we're concerned about today, sir, are those who disobey our law, our Constitution, our sovereignty and our border.
 
As a nation that values immigration, and depends on immigration, we should have immigration laws that work and make us proud. Yet today we do not.
 
DD: Thanks to the federal government's refusal to act, sir.
 
Illegal entry across our borders makes more difficult the urgent task of securing the homeland.
 
DD: Huh? Remember the TV commercial when the Aflack duck got totally frustrated trying to make sense of what Yogi Berra was saying? Well, the same nonsense applies here.
 
The system is not working.
 
DD: Is there an echo in here, Mr. President? We have been complaining about this for years. We have offered solid, no-nonsense solutions to the problem and you did not listen.
 
Reform must begin by confronting a basic fact of life and economics: some of the jobs being generated in America's growing economy are jobs American citizens are not filling.
 
DD: Many Americans do not have to do these jobs because illegals are already doing them. And most Americans go the legal route in pursuit of work. They respond to job ads in the newspaper, or they go down to Job Service or a business place and fill out applications for jobs. Americans don't stand on corners waiting for a guy in a pickup truck to pull over, pick them up and whisk them away to a job.
 
Yet these jobs represent a tremendous opportunity for workers from abroad who want to work and fulfill their duties as a husband or a wife, a son or a daughter.
 
DD: And a tremendous responsibility for our government and our border patrol to enforce the law.
 
Many undocumented workers have walked mile after mile, through the heat of the day and the cold of the night. Some have risked their lives in dangerous desert border crossings, or entrusted their lives to the brutal rings of heartless human smugglers. Workers who seek
only to earn a living end up in the shadows of American life -- fearful, often abused and exploited. When they are victimized by crime, they are afraid to call the police, or seek recourse in the legal system. They are cut off from their families far away, fearing if they leave our country to visit relatives back home, they might never be able to return to their jobs.
 
DD: Yes, Mr. President, lawbreaking is often associated with stress, anxiety and violence.
 
The situation I described is wrong. It is not the American way

DD: We're glad you finally see things our way.
 
Out of common sense and fairness, our laws should allow willing workers to enter our country and fill jobs that Americans have are not filling.
 
DD: Out of common sense and fairness to the American people, our laws should be enforced and our sovereignty protected.
 
We must make our immigration laws more rational, and more humane.
 
DD: No, sir. We must merely enforce our laws or remove these laws from the books if they are worth less than the paper they are printed on.
 
America must control its borders.
 
DD: We've been trying to tell you that, sir. Congressman Tom Tancredo has been trying to tell you that, sir. And your pit bull, Karl Rove, is trying to find someone who will run against Cong. Tancredo this year. We were not born yesterday, sir.
 
Following the attacks of September the 11th, 2001, this duty of the federal government has become even more urgent. And we're fulfilling that duty.
 
DD: You have done a very poor job of convincing us of that, sir.
 
For the first time in our history, we have consolidated all border agencies under one roof to make sure they share information and the work is more effective. We're matching all visa applicants against an expanded screening list to identify terrorists and criminals and
immigration violators.
 
DD: Are you doing this at the cactus patch illegal alien trail located 58 miles from the nearest town down in the desert, sir?
 
This month, we have begun using advanced technology to better record and track aliens who enter our country -- and to make sure they leave as scheduled.
 
DD: Mr. President, we are more concerned that they don't enter the U.S. in the first place. By the way, who schedules their departures, and how do we know they have any plans at all to leave "as scheduled"?
 
We have significantly expanded the Border Patrol -- with more than a thousand new agents on the borders, and 40 percent greater funding over the last two years.
 
DD: But, sir, why are there still illegal aliens on the street corners looking for work here?
 
We're working closely with the Canadian and Mexican governments to increase border security.
 
DD: That's fine. Now try working more with the American people, and try listening to us for a change.
 
Our borders should be shut and barred tight to criminals, to drug traders, to drug traffickers and to criminals, and to terrorists.
 
DD: We agree on this, Mr. President. But the government has not calmed our doubts through its inability and unwillingness to accomplish this. That's why we have citizens' patrols on the border today.
 
New immigration laws should serve the economic needs of our country. If an American employer is offering a job that American citizens are not willing to take, we ought to welcome into our country a person who will fill that job.
 
DD: I could not disagree with you more, sir.
 
We should not give unfair rewards to illegal immigrants in the citizenship process.
 
DD: We are more concerned about the unfair rewards going to illegal immigrants who have no interest in our citizenship process.
 
New laws should provide incentives for temporary, foreign workers to return permanently to their home countries after their period of work in the United States has expired.
 
DD: We plan to hold you to this commitment, sir. We'll let you know how well you did on Nov. 2nd.
 
Today, I ask the Congress to join me in passing new immigration laws that reflect these principles, that meet America's economic needs, and live up to our highest ideals.
 
DD: Today, I ask Congress to reject the president's plan and to take actions to seriously protect the borders in a way that protects Americans and America's sovereignty.
 
I propose a new temporary worker program that will match willing foreign workers with willing American employers, when no Americans can be found to fill the jobs.
 
DD: It's the "temporary" part that worries me. Let's start advertising these jobs and fill them with Americans, rather than utilizing the Ford pickup human resources process.
 
This program will offer legal status, as temporary workers, to the millions of undocumented men and women now employed in the United States, and to those in foreign countries who seek to participate in the program and have been offered employment here. This new system should be clear and efficient, so employers are able to find workers
quickly and simply.
 
DD: Who's running for president for the Constitution Party?
 
All who participate in the temporary worker program must have a job, or, if not living in the United States, a job offer.
 
DD: Whoa, whoa, whoa! How about unemployed Americans?
 
The legal status granted by this program will last three years and will be renewable -- but it will have an end.
 
DD: You have endeared skepticism with this promise, Mr. President.
 
Participants who do not remain employed, who do not follow the rules of the program, or who break the law will not be eligible for continued participation and will be required to return to their home.
 
DD: That sounds like a lot of paperwork and bureaucracy. Why not just preserve the integrity of our borders now and not create the need for all this red tape? Who is going to police this?
 
Under my proposal, employers have key responsibilities.
 
DD: We've seen these responsibilities carried out in the Ford pickups.
 
Employers who extend job offers must first make every reasonable effort to find an American worker for the job at hand.
 
DD: They had better offer a fair wage to the Americans.
 
Employers must not hire undocumented aliens or temporary workers whose legal status has expired.
 
DD: Sir, they are not honoring the laws we have now. Why should we believe they will honor new laws?
 
They must report to the government the temporary workers they hire, and who leave their employ, so that we can keep track of people in the program, and better enforce immigration laws.
 
DD: Just like no one is doing now.
 
There must be strong workplace enforcement with tough penalties for anyone, for any employer violating these laws.
 
DD: We could solve a lot of problems with an executive order to this effect right now.
 
This program expects temporary workers to return permanently to their home countries after their period of work in the United States has expired.
 
DD: Expectin' ain't gettin'.
 
All participants will be issued a temporary worker card that will allow them to travel back and forth between their home and the United States without fear of being denied re-entry into our country.
 
DD: Illegals are passing in and out of the country now without cards. Think of the savings of not having to print laminated cards!
 
I also support making it easier for temporary workers to contribute a portion of their earnings to tax-preferred savings accounts, money they can collect as they return to their native countries.
 
DD: How about using this tax money to reimburse the U.S. hospitals and governmental units getting zapped by illegals now? It might prevent the closing of some of the hospitals in the Southwest.
 
After all, in many of those countries, a small nest egg is what is necessary to start their own business, or buy some land for their family.
 
DD: Yes, let's focus on helping citizens of other countries start nest eggs and purchase land while some of our own businesses are being forced to close their doors and put their employees on the unemployment line.
  
The citizenship line, however, is too long, and our current limits on legal immigration are too low.
 
DD: Too low? In whose view? Many people would take exception with your statement.
 
My administration will work with the Congress to increase the annual number of green cards that can lead to citizenship.
 
DD: How much will fake green cards sell for on the black market?
 
In the process of immigration reform, we must also set high expectations for what new citizens should know.
 
DD: Why don't we first start with the students in our own public schools, who seem to be lacking in that regard, thanks to teachers and administrators imposing the humanist religion on our children, while at the same refusing to teach them anything of value.
 
Law enforcement will face fewer problems with undocumented workers, and will be better able to focus on the true threats to our nation from criminals and terrorists. And when temporary workers can travel legally and freely, there will be more efficient management of our borders and more effective enforcement against those who pose a danger to our country.
 
DD: And certainly no one would think of creating fake documents to come to America for illegal, possibly terroristic, purposes either.
 
This new system will be more compassionate.
 
DD: Then why is your conservative base so angry?
 
Decent, hard-working people will now be protected by labor laws, with the right to change jobs, earn fair wages, and enjoy the same working conditions that the law requires for American workers.
 
DD: These hard-working people will also continue, with your help, to dissolve the border and help establish your union of the Americas.
 
In a few days I will go to Mexico for the Special Summit of the Americas, where we will discuss ways to advance free trade, and to fight corruption, and encourage the reforms that lead to prosperity.
 
DD: Please don't give away the company store there, too, Mr. President.
 
Real growth and real hope in the nations of our hemisphere will lessen the flow of new immigrants to America--
 
DD: To quote the late "Duke," John Wayne: like heck it will!
 
The temporary worker program I am proposing today represents the best tradition of our society, a society that honors the law, and welcomes the newcomer.
 
DD: This doesn't say much for our society, though in this case our society seems to honor law more so than the president does.
 
This plan will help return order and fairness to our immigration system, and in so doing we will honor our values, by showing our respect for those who work hard and share in the ideals of America.
 
DD: It will do nothing of the sort. Who are you kidding, Mr. President?
 
 
As a postscript, Colorado conservative Cong. Tom Tancredo is vowing that this program will not pass in Congress. Conservatives must pressure their federal representatives to oppose the Temporary Worker Program and assure its defeat.

 


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; bordersecurity; illegalimmigration; invasion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2004 10:46:32 AM PST by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HiJinx; Marine Inspector; JackelopeBreeder; SandRat; AZHSer; gubamyster; JustPiper
pint
2 posted on 01/09/2004 10:47:10 AM PST by Spiff (Have you committed a random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
Kenya




20.00
1

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 01/09/2004 10:51:31 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Hi Mom! Hi Dad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Excellent.
4 posted on 01/09/2004 10:54:42 AM PST by SAMWolf (Ted Kennedy's Bumper Sticker: My other car is underwater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
As a postscript, Colorado conservative Cong. Tom Tancredo is vowing that this program will not pass in Congress. Conservatives must pressure their federal representatives to oppose the Temporary Worker Program and assure its defeat.

Yes, we need to contact our representatives, but not about THIS plan! I can't believe so many people have forgotten a basic fact that I learned in elementary school...the President does not make law, Congress does! As Tancredo implies, Bush's plan will be in the cross-cut shredder the minute it hits Congress. There are currently two bills being considered, one in the Senate and one in the House:

House Version Sponsored by Tom Tancredo of CO

Senate Version Sponsored by John Cornyn of TX

Tancredo's plan puts the military on the border until we can train enough border patrol, increases the border patrol and detention centers, ends the "anchor child" problem, increases penalties and bonds and much more. We need to forget about Bush's plan and get on the Tancredo bandwagon by writing our Congress-critters!

5 posted on 01/09/2004 10:56:36 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
BTTT!!!
6 posted on 01/09/2004 11:06:51 AM PST by jimkress (Save America from the tryanny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
bttt
7 posted on 01/09/2004 11:09:38 AM PST by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Fundamental premise of Liberalism:

"Laws are to be obeyed only when convenient and then, only by the masses. Us superior folk don't need no stinkin laws nor do we need to obey them"

Bush is ignoring the violation of the law by these illegal alien criminals. Bush is demonstrating he is a CINO Liberal.
8 posted on 01/09/2004 11:09:41 AM PST by jimkress (Save America from the tryanny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
If this passes.....I'm not voting for Bush!
9 posted on 01/09/2004 11:15:23 AM PST by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arpege92
I'm with Spiff. Lets ship all of our high paying tech jobs overseas while at the same time inviting illegals here to rum amok. Great re-election plan Jorge!!
10 posted on 01/09/2004 11:19:36 AM PST by landorepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Your posting to a GOP crowd on a conservative forum.

A crowd that firmly beleives its better to utilize the limited resouces of the INS to do back ground checks on perhaps MILLIONS of Latino immigrants then to focus those limited resouces on screening Arabs and Muslims.

We have bought the profiling argument to keep our party guy in power no matter what. Your attempts to uss this site to push the "party" right will not go undebated!
11 posted on 01/09/2004 11:29:29 AM PST by Kay Soze (How will refocusing INS resources from the war on terror to millions of Mexicans make US safer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Bump
12 posted on 01/09/2004 11:33:56 AM PST by apackof2 (I won't be satisfied until I am to smart for my own good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Contacting the White House

Mailing Address

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Phone Numbers

Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461

TTY/TDD

Comments: 202-456-6213
Visitors Office: 202-456-2121
E-Mail President George W. Bush: president@whitehouse.gov
Vice President Richard Cheney: vice.president@whitehouse.gov

13 posted on 01/09/2004 11:40:55 AM PST by apackof2 (I won't be satisfied until I am to smart for my own good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
We have bought the profiling argument to keep our party guy in power no matter what. Your attempts to uss this site to push the "party" right will not go undebated!

I will never miss any opportunity to push the Republican Party to the right. To that end, I ran for and was elected Republican Precinct Committeeman in my district so that I could have a vote in the local Republican Party - to push the party to the right. I've introduced resolutions at local party meetings - to push the party to the right. I was elected President of the South East Arizona Republican Club - a very conservative Republican Club whose mission is to push the party to the right.

Is my agenda that obvious?

14 posted on 01/09/2004 11:51:45 AM PST by Spiff (Have you committed a random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
We left the age of the Rule Of Law many years ago.

We have entered the age of the Rule Of Men...
15 posted on 01/09/2004 11:55:00 AM PST by superloser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
A crowd that firmly beleives its better to utilize the limited resouces of the INS to do back ground checks on perhaps MILLIONS of Latino immigrants then to focus those limited resouces on screening Arabs and Muslims.

Funny how the INS still can't do both, in spite of federal spending increasing by 23% since 2001. Why is it we have plenty enough money to explode spending in every area except immigration and border control?

16 posted on 01/09/2004 11:57:23 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
>>"Following the attacks of September the 11th, 2001, this duty of the federal government has become even more urgent." <<

This is beneath contempt...using murdered Americans as an excuse to advance this agenda. My view of GWB will never be the same, I fear.
17 posted on 01/09/2004 12:00:01 PM PST by SerpentDove (The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arpege92
Why? Do you like the prospect of a President Dean or President Clark? Please remember Clinton's 8 years of pillage.
18 posted on 01/09/2004 12:55:31 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kevao
Stranger is the argument that while we lack the resources and "cannot set up border guard towers every 500 feet" we will have the resources to do background checks and follow up on perhaps millions of "guest" workers.

I am not saying we should set up such towers but how can a GOPer argue they cannot increase the security of the borders while at the same time argue to increase the resources to monitor people once they have reached base and tagged in as "safe"!

In this case secruing our borders does not garner votes while "monitoring" those that made it past our security does.

I am not even touching on the it’s a post 9/11 world in which we should use more not less of our INS resources to monitor unfriendlies rather than cheap labor.


Its up to us to push the party right.
19 posted on 01/09/2004 1:28:35 PM PST by Kay Soze (How will refocusing INS resources from the war on terror to millions of Mexicans make US safer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson