Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS will track Free File taxpayers
USA TODAY ^ | 1/09/04 | Thomas A. Fogarty,

Posted on 01/09/2004 2:37:07 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:41:39 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The IRS this year will flag taxpayers who use its free electronic filing program, a change that has touched off a privacy firestorm. Industry leader Intuit says it simply won't comply with an IRS directive to identify by electronic code free e-filers who use its TurboTax software.


(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: irs; privacy

1 posted on 01/09/2004 2:37:07 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The 2.8 million should just send in paper forms. Make them work a bit for the money they take.
2 posted on 01/09/2004 3:00:28 AM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
44 North Dakota 65.00
1
65.00
28
2.32


Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 01/09/2004 3:01:34 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
Make them work a bit for the money they take.

On the other hand, 'them' and 'they' are our hired help-- and it's so hard to get good help these days.  I'm just a retired head of a family of four, and every year my return is a 30 page book. 

There are so many ways they could allow me to file electronically-- hell, they could just let me email the damn thing.  But no, email is just too complicated for those clowns.  The IRS is typical of too many government and large company operations, straight out of Dilbert.

4 posted on 01/09/2004 5:10:50 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Intuit says it simply won't comply with an IRS directive to identify by electronic code free e-filers who use its TurboTax software.

but I thought IRS directives were law!

5 posted on 01/09/2004 5:14:49 AM PST by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The article fails to explain just what the issue is here. What's the downside of flagging free filers?

They've got every scrap of information about you on the form already. Why should you get your shorts in a twist over them knowing what software you used to file with?

I'm all for paranoia, but lets be rational about it ;-)

6 posted on 01/09/2004 5:18:58 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot_wes
but I thought IRS directives were law!

No, they're government regulations intended to implement Title 26 of the United States Code.

Kindly learn the difference.

7 posted on 01/09/2004 5:25:11 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
When will America wake up? The IRS has got to go!
8 posted on 01/09/2004 5:26:53 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
http://web.archive.org/web/20011116191936/www.arrowplastics.com/congressional_record.htm
9 posted on 01/09/2004 5:38:33 AM PST by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
The 2.8 million should just send in paper forms. Make them work a bit for the money they take.

I ALWAYS do my taxes the old-fashioned way: ink pen, calculator, and shove it all in the envelope the day before April 15th.

Why should I convenience the government?

10 posted on 01/09/2004 5:42:19 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: patriot_wes
And the relevance of that link is...
11 posted on 01/09/2004 6:16:02 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Were they refering here to the 16th? and what is the income that according to the regulations isn't taxable due to the Constitution???
12 posted on 01/09/2004 8:19:14 AM PST by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: patriot_wes
Were they refering here to the 16th?

What eventually became the 16th Amendment, yes.

and what is the income that according to the regulations isn't taxable due to the Constitution???

Income from renting real estate. The income tax law in question treated said tax as an indirect tax. In the Pollock case, the Supreme Court ruled that taxes on income derived from real estate rents were direct taxes, and thus subject to apportionment by census (a painful process). Incidentally, OTHER income taxes were unaffected by the Pollock case and still classed as indirect taxes, and were thus completely Constitutional.

13 posted on 01/09/2004 8:42:46 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Did you read this part?....."The decision of the Supreme Court in the income-tax cases deprived the National Government of a power which, by reason of previous decisions of the court, it was generally supposed that Government had."
14 posted on 01/09/2004 9:22:56 AM PST by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: patriot_wes
Did you read this part?....."The decision of the Supreme Court in the income-tax cases deprived the National Government of a power which, by reason of previous decisions of the court, it was generally supposed that Government had."

Exactly. Previous decisions had ruled that very same income tax law constitutional in all particulars. The Supreme Court very abruptly reversed themselves in Pollock. The next great flip-flop of that sort would be in the late 1930s, with the incredible expansion of the meaning of "interstate commerce." Generally, when the court flips that suddenly on something that had already been decided, it's a good guess that the new decision is wrong.

15 posted on 01/09/2004 9:28:24 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson