Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Orion78
There are no rocks in that area, NASA needs to be careful
about quicksand. We don't need the rover getting caught in
a bed of mud/ water covered in sand. just my .02 cents
96 posted on 01/09/2004 3:16:18 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Orlando
I was listening to a press conference a day or two ago via NASA TV online and they suggested that they might be able to roll only one wheel into "sleepy hollow" to see if it was solid enough to drive on or not. Also, if it turns out that the dark marks inside "sleepy hollow" are indeed bounce marks from the airbags, then it should be safe enough to drive on.

I do agree though, they should be careful. Nothing would be worse than to get that rover caught somewhere.
123 posted on 01/09/2004 10:20:45 AM PST by Orion78 (Who died and made you thread monitor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Orlando
>>>...We don't need the rover getting caught in a bed of mud/ water covered in sand.

The temperature there is much too cold to have a bed of mud.

Way below zero.

213 posted on 01/14/2004 1:51:29 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson