Clinton, other then selling defence secrets to China, wasn't so bad. He pretty much didn't do anything except have a good time in the oval office. I much prefer a do nothing president to a advance the liberal agenda president. And Bush is an advance the liberal agenda president, he reminds me of LBJ (spit). I still think the Clinton years were worse, from a moral standpoint. However, violating one's oath of office and signing bills that violate rights of the First and Tenth Amendments isn't exactly moral, either.
From a fiscal standpoint in terms of spending, the Bush years have been worse- as you mentioned, LBJ-like.
Freepers once again fall prey to the transparent and pathetic attempts by the Left to split the Right.
Bush's plan is BRILLIANT.
You just don't know it yet.