To: F16Fighter
I am not advocating that we kill all those that attempt to cross our border, but a few shots fired in their direction would likely be one of the most cost-effective measures available to stem the tide.
To: Ed_in_NJ
I am not advocating that we kill all those that attempt to cross our border, but a few shots fired in their direction would likely be one of the most cost-effective measures available to stem the tide.Then you're ultimately suggesting that we kill all those who attempt to cross our border. Pretending that you're not is right up there with Clinton saying that his willie in Monica's mouth didn't equal sex.
And, incidentally, you'd also make America's first capital misdemeanor.
575 posted on
01/12/2004 5:32:28 AM PST by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: Ed_in_NJ
"I am not advocating that we kill all those that attempt to cross our border, but a few shots fired would likely be one of the most cost-effective measures available to stem the tide."Upon posting a clear and concise warning, "a few shots fired in their direction" might not only be "cost effective," but America's right to do so in order to protect it's sovereignty AND have it's laws enforced.
For that we owe NO ONE an explanation.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson