Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevao
Nice try, but there's no "intercept commercial airliners" clause, either.

Actually, there is. Check out the Air Force's missions.

478 posted on 01/09/2004 5:45:28 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
Actually, there is. Check out the Air Force's missions.

Link please. It's just too hard to believe that the National Security Act of 1947 was prescient enough to include a clause covering a terrorist hijacking of a commercial airliner.

485 posted on 01/09/2004 5:59:18 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah; kevao
"Check out the Air Force's missions."

The Air Force is allowed to enforce border control?

491 posted on 01/09/2004 6:07:31 PM PST by Happy2BMe (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
Actually, there is. Check out the Air Force's missions.

Actually, I did just that. Here is a link to the entire text of the National Security Act of 1947 pertaining to the Air Force:

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/postwwii/nsa47.htm

And now I know what the problem has been around here, Poohbah. You are full of shit, Poohbah.

Where in the text does the Act task the Air Force with intercepting commercial airliners that have been hijacked by terrorists?

498 posted on 01/09/2004 6:16:40 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson