Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElkGroveDan
Howard is UNELECTABLE. Period. He's not a serious candidate.

Jones has won Statewide twice.

In la-la land like California, that's all I care about.



7 posted on 01/08/2004 3:38:00 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: zbigreddogz
Not at all.

Howard's helped recall a governor, pressured CBS into dropping it's anti-Reagan miniseries, and won his three races for State Assembly.

In Bill Jones' last statewide campaign he got less than 10% of the vote in Southern California Counties!!!

Kaloogian's southern California base will not only power him over Jones, but more importantly over Boxer in the general.

Howard's the man to finally rid us of Barbara Boxer once and for all!

10 posted on 01/08/2004 3:40:41 PM PST by Impeach98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: zbigreddogz
Jones is UNELECTABLE. Period. He's not a serious candidate.

Kaloogian is conservative.

That's all I care about.
14 posted on 01/08/2004 3:49:26 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: zbigreddogz
If you use the silly qualification of only voting for people that you think are electable, then why don't you just vote for Boxer? She's already won that senate seat twice...

Personally, when I go to the polls to vote, I vote for the person who is most likely to support the values that I agree with. And Bill "Tax Increase" Jones is NOT that man.

Howard Kaloogian has always been a consistent tax fighter, has always been a consistent friend of liberty, and I see no reason to play down his experience. Hell, Kaloogian worked to get Gray Davis recalled. Jones couldn't even make it through the primary to face Davis back in 2002...

Third place finish for Jones doesn't exactly sound "electable" to me...

Doug
15 posted on 01/08/2004 3:49:57 PM PST by DougLorenz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: zbigreddogz
Arnold proved that you need to motivate your supporters to win in California. He did it on celebrity power. Kaloogian does it because he rallies people with his clear and unambiguous language.

The problem with Jones, a decent enough fellow, is that he his saddled with four big negatives:
1. The Bush double cross for McCain.
2. Promoing the big tax increase.
3. Being a very bland and boring campaigner.
4. No ability to raise money.

Jones can't win; Kaloogian proved with the Recall campaign that a scappy effort can win -- even when the estbalishment is asleep at the switch.

20 posted on 01/08/2004 3:56:31 PM PST by RWGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: zbigreddogz
Howard is UNELECTABLE. Period. He's not a serious candidate.

Can you elaborate? I'd like to hear more about Kaloogian.

-PJ

30 posted on 01/08/2004 4:08:13 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: zbigreddogz
Howard is ..... He's not....

In your opinion

56 posted on 01/08/2004 5:49:53 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson