To: Dead Dog
WoaoaoaaoaoHH!!! Stop the gosh-darned presses!! We still have the Saturn V prints!? This isn't hugh, it isn't even merely HUGE, It's:
GIGANTIC!!!
I'm with you - substitutes/retools to get the parts we would need is not be that hard. Spending the money to scrub the requirements to get the hardware converted from 1960's tech to 2003 tech would be nigh-insignificant in comparison to ground-up development. It was a watershed of new ideas and was a system built to do a lot, reclaiming it's capability would be outstanding.
Ahh!! Man, I'll all in a tizzy about this!
8 posted on
01/08/2004 2:30:06 PM PST by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Frank_Discussion
I'm with you - substitutes/retools to get the parts we would need is not be that hard. Spending the money to scrub the requirements to get the hardware converted from 1960's tech to 2003 tech would be nigh-insignificant in comparison to ground-up development. It was a watershed of new ideas and was a system built to do a lot, reclaiming it's capability would be outstanding. On the contrary -- the requirements are easy, and have not been lost. In fact, we know a lot more than we did then. The hard part is precisely getting the tooling and hardware to build exact-duplicate Saturn V components. Consider, for example, the computer hardware. All of that stuff would have to be rebuilt, as opposed to buying it off the shelf. To give you an example, one of the hottest tasks at Kennedy Space Center is going around to old computer hardware places and buying up things like 8086 chips. They're not made anymore, but the ground support equipment is based on them. Suppose they couldn't get the 8086's anymore. It would be much cheaper and easier to rebuild the ground support equipment from scratch, than to restart an 8086 production line.
If you extend that problem to virtually every component -- right down to the availability of certain specialty metals -- you'll find that the real cost is in putting all of those components back into production.
Much better to use the design elements where applicable, but basically to redesign using modern ideas and equipment.
The bottom-line reason the Saturn V isn't built anymore is because there's no MARKET for something that big and expensive.
31 posted on
01/08/2004 2:56:21 PM PST by
r9etb
To: Frank_Discussion
I've always wanted to get a good, full size blueprints of the Saturn V or the V2 to frame and hand on the wall of my den. I originally wanted to frame a set of blueprints of "the gadget" that was set off during the Manhattan Project, but I knew that was too much to ask for.
43 posted on
01/08/2004 3:12:23 PM PST by
Orangedog
(Remain calm...all is well! [/sarcasm])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson