To: RightWhale
> scanning from paper to image file is labor-intensive
You have no idea. This is an expense virtually no company is willing to undertake (scanning millions of pages? Sheesh), especially if they have extensive files. And having seen NASA and DTIC documents that they've doen this with... you don't WANT 'em to. The resolution goes straight to hell. They are scanned in B&W, and saved as low-rez PDFs. Many drawings simply disappear.
To: orionblamblam
We have had excellent results with our local property records including subdivision plats. 1000s of drawings--many very hard to read in original--have turned out most excellently.
78 posted on
01/08/2004 4:56:27 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: orionblamblam
Orionblamblam...
Welcome to FRee Republic. (lol, just plain 'blam')
84 posted on
01/08/2004 5:19:09 PM PST by
blam
To: orionblamblam; RightWhale
76 - "> scanning from paper to image file is labor-intensive
You have no idea. This is an expense virtually no company is willing to undertake (scanning millions of pages? Sheesh), especially if they have extensive files. And having seen NASA and DTIC documents that they've doen this with... you don't WANT 'em to. The resolution goes straight to hell. They are scanned in B&W, and saved as low-rez PDFs. Many drawings simply disappear."
Boy, are you right there. Many of the shuttle drawings or parts of them have simply 'disappeared' in their conversion to microfische. Just flat gone. Originals, gone. Microfische, empty or illegible or gone.
118 posted on
01/09/2004 12:16:48 PM PST by
XBob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson