Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saturn 5 Blueprints Safely in Storage
space.com ^ | 13 March 2000 | By Michael Paine

Posted on 01/08/2004 2:20:33 PM PST by Dead Dog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 next last
To: Mr170IQ
EGAD! It's posting from sci.space!

The sci.space.policy groups were discussing EXACTLY this issue six to eight years ago. A search at google of Mars/Moon/sci.space discussion shows some interesting discussions.

Are you a former Sci.space junkie?
201 posted on 01/11/2004 8:40:21 AM PST by bonesmccoy (defend America...get vaccinated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: skyhntr
I totally agree with you. It could even be built using a modular concept where extra strap-ons could give it extra heft when needed.

By the way, what is wrong with using Energia? Production on it could be restarted rather more easily than re-building the Saturn V or starting the Magnum program.

202 posted on 01/11/2004 9:04:30 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Do you have personal experience in the space program? Are you an engineer?
203 posted on 01/11/2004 9:11:05 AM PST by bonesmccoy (defend America...get vaccinated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Remember Y2K? Dragging retired COBOL prograsmmers away from their porch swings. Gads, what a fiasco!
204 posted on 01/11/2004 10:21:48 AM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
194 - "Just the EPA requirements would kill this project before it got started. It's still hard for me to believe that at KSC, rainwater is handled as "hazardous waste" and hauled off to a disposal site at a cost of over one dollar per gallon. (Exceeds the EPA requirement for Zinc after it has come in contact with the galvanized drain piping.)"

Sort of right - from my personal experience in about 1990: there are collection ponds at each pad, to catch the rain and launch water. Each one is governed by a separate and distinct EPA regulation. Regularly, and after each launch, many 55 gallon drums of precipitates are dumped ino the ponds. And they 'precipitate' out the 'impurities'. After about 6 weeks (if I remember correctly), they pump out the ponds crud, which is put into 55 gallon drums, and sent as hazardous waste to an underground disposal site in Alabama. The shipping cost at that time was about $350 per barrel.

Wiltech had the contract to do this. They also performed water testing. Tap water did not reach required EPA tests, and had to be disposed of as hazardous waste. Canal water, could not be returned to the canals from which it came, as it failed to meet EPA specs.

Any time sand blasting was done, it required a special EPA permit. Canvas tarpaulins had to be spread out and collect all the residue (particularly on the gantries), and then the paint chips, sand and 'gunk' collected in the tarpaulins which all were disposed of as 'hazardous waste'.
205 posted on 01/11/2004 2:47:24 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
194 - "This is nothing more than wishful thinking by George W. Bush."

LOL - Very true, plus, the waste of about $1 billion he allocated or was it 800-900 million?
206 posted on 01/11/2004 2:50:03 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; bonesmccoy
197 - last I saw them in 1992, Many of the rusting hulk remnants were sitting in some fields down near the Hypergolic Maintenance Facility (HMF), still rusting away in the weeds, with everybody afraid to touch them because of EPA requirements.
207 posted on 01/11/2004 2:57:59 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
197 - "These people who think going back to the moon will be easy if we can only find "the blueprints" don't have a clue. No offence to any FReepers, but it just isn't that simple."

How true.
208 posted on 01/11/2004 2:59:14 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy; snopercod; All
191 - Interesting info bones, but not what I was after. There was a story floating around, years ago, that they actually began building a new pad and facilities for the 'bigger than saturn5' launch facility at KSC. Some concrete was actually poured. And then there was a quietus, it suddenly stopped, and even the poured concrete had to be destroyed and literally dug up.

Long time ago, around Carter's time, and just a story, but I was hoping someone would know about it.
209 posted on 01/11/2004 3:17:04 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I understand the concerns of trying to "modify" or "bring up to code" the original spec's.. but I don't see the problem concerning the abilities to obtain mil-spec hardware. This concern makes me think of the $700 "mil-spec" ball peen hammers from Ace Hardware down the street. hardware is hardware. (I only issue this concern for hardware) other parts ie; skins, electronics, propulsion and other space specific equipment needs are a whole different subject all together. We KNOW the Saturn works. it lifts what, 20k tons more than we need at the moment. Even IF we had to start from close to scratch, Geee would our economy be able to handle a few new job openings around the country for all the people who have been laid off in the last few years to fill the positions that would open up to build all the new parts.(and of course with major security concerns, we would only be able to employ US citizens.. No H1B's or Illegal Aliens I mean UNDOCUMENTED CITIZENS) I think the only thing we could gain from dealing with Russian technology is their studies in the "longevity in space" area. Skylab only lasted for 10 years where as the Russian MIR surpassed it's life expectancy by 20 years(That should be how our products are built) and their Studies of longevity in space on Human Physiology would be equally helpful
IMHO
210 posted on 01/11/2004 3:23:47 PM PST by skyhntr (If it's so easy to "Just Be Yourself", then why are there so many books on the subject?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
190 - Well, I personally turned up the burning story, twice, from two separate people, at two separate times at KSC. One guy worked at KSC, was a Lockheed guy, ex-Rockwell type, the other was a Rockwell type who had moved from Downey to KSC. Neither knew each other was there, both told the same story to me separately. I personally got them together and re-introduced them to each other again, and they got busy telling some old 'war stories' from years before when they had worked together.

So, what is really true, about Saturn5 prints, I don't know. But Rockwell owning the shuttle orbiter design is pretty standard kowledge.
211 posted on 01/11/2004 3:25:25 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
W00t!! we're ready for that. There are still die-hard schools around the country pushing COBOL, CICS, DB2 in their curriculum.. In fact Pick me!! :) Nine months of COBOL!! I'm a recent BS in CIS and I like COBOL, (Why did that sound like an AA intro *lol*)and I'd love to find a COBOL job opening for entry level.. maybe with this announcement of a direction in the space industry there will be an opening for me!!
212 posted on 01/11/2004 3:31:17 PM PST by skyhntr (If it's so easy to "Just Be Yourself", then why are there so many books on the subject?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
204 - "Remember Y2K? Dragging retired COBOL prograsmmers away from their porch swings. Gads, what a fiasco!"

Yes Sir - Do you remember too, xlinton sending teams of our precious few cobol programmers to china, to help them survive, while we didn't have enough here?
213 posted on 01/11/2004 3:37:07 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: skyhntr
Some Finance Dept printouts still have that COBOL look. But I believe IT when they say they are all on versions of VBA now. Maybe I'll ask them to load that 1/2 inch FORTRAN IV tape I still have in the bottom drawer.
214 posted on 01/11/2004 3:45:31 PM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: XBob
No, did Clinton do that? Was he trying to help, or hinder?
215 posted on 01/11/2004 3:47:43 PM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
The Apollo Moon Mission profile passed up Earth Orbit Rendezvous because it was viewed as too complex. In those days, of course, it took a computer the size of a city block nearly three days to compute an orbital rendezvous. Today it can be done in a few minutes on a laptop.

What this means is that we don't need to rebuild the Saturn 5. We can launch the component pieces of a Moon Mission into Earth orbit using off-the-shelf boosters, such as the Titan, and then rendezvous and proceed to the Moon.

216 posted on 01/11/2004 3:49:42 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
David Weeks' Saturn V Technical Drawings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Six years of research has finally paid off for space modelers: David Weeks has brought forth a ten sheet set of drawings detailing the exterior and interior of the most powerful operational launch vehicle ever produced. Drawn in constant 1/48th scale and reproduced on 24 X 36 paper, these drawings provide details not available anywhere else. The example scans hardly do justice to this set.
217 posted on 01/11/2004 3:54:46 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Hmmm The only finance dept. that would consider hiring me was Enron.. I don't want to say that I wasn't at the head of my class in Accounting But..... the only seat behind me was out in the hall ;)*lol*
I've seen a few books on Fortran but have never played with it.. I have gotten to play with Assembly Language on the old TRS-80's which was fun as well... Maybe I should pull my old Timex Sinclaire out of the closet and start boning up eh??
218 posted on 01/11/2004 3:57:10 PM PST by skyhntr (Will Code For Food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: XBob
There is no doubt about it... The Saturn V was a beauitul piece of work. Thx for the link!!
219 posted on 01/11/2004 4:02:09 PM PST by skyhntr (Will Code For Food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: skyhntr
I don't think anybody posts on FR with less than a VIC-20. Maybe somebody could try an RCA COSMAC and establish a new lower bound.
220 posted on 01/11/2004 4:04:09 PM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson