Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01
Under the circumstances, bringing, say, six million more workers into the Social Security system is not a bad idea.

But these workers aren't going to be in the Social Security system. Once they have their legal status, they must be paid at least minimum wage. At that point, these newly legalized illegals will be undercut by a new wave of illegals, who will work for less than minimum wage. And we're back to square one.

40 posted on 01/08/2004 8:34:31 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: kevao
"But these workers aren't going to be in the Social Security system. Once they have their legal status, they must be paid at least minimum wage."

Exactly.

"At that point, these newly legalized illegals will be undercut by a new wave of illegals, who will work for less than minimum wage. And we're back to square one."

Then, being without a job to justify their work permit, they'll have to go home, won't they?

Eventually, Bush's program depends upon enforcement of a.) minimum wage laws and b.) legal entry.

But it's not unrealistic to think that such can be done. Because, prior to 1967, much the same "guest worker" policy was in force -- the so-called bracero program. It's noteworthy that, while the bracero program existed, there was no illegal immigration problem.

Indeed, the problem didn't begin to occur until the LBJ administration cancelled the bracero program at the behest of Cesar Chavez and his United Farm Workers union.

49 posted on 01/08/2004 8:43:54 AM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson