To: Burkeman1
Clarkie would fold in the debate. He'd lose his temper and his responses to quesitons posed would be like: "I heard, I thought, it was mentioned or it was there or it was here or whatever. He'd get flustered so...him or dean would be fine.
To: cubreporter
Yeah- but people are stupid. He was a "general" so that must mean he is a "moderate." That is certainly how the press will paint him. And he doesn't have the ideological lodestone around his neck like Dean does.
32 posted on
01/08/2004 8:19:03 AM PST by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: cubreporter; Burkeman1
Sorry Burkeman1, I have to diagree with you, Dean is the one who worries me, albeit a slight worry.
Cubreporter is right imo, because Clark doesn't like to be challenged, he's a GENERAL dammit! The man is an egomaniac and he's ready to blow any time now. Additionally Clark has a bad habit of spreading lies and innuendo to prop himself up. Whether to make himself look like he's on the inside or important or the uber prop up; the presidency.
Personally, I have my fingers crossed for a Dean/Clark ticket. :-)
36 posted on
01/08/2004 8:32:16 AM PST by
BigWaveBetty
(Decay of the dem party is delightful, delicious and delovely.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson