[section9]

Sorry, Galt. Saying that Mylroie is a phony and proving it appear to be two different things for you.

Just because you want to pretend that Saddam was some sort of choirboy to justify your head-in-the-sand attitude towards this war doesn't mean we have to live in your fantasy world.

In case you haven't heard, there's a war on.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

[JohnGalt]

No, I think 31 and 38 was my evidence that I found her to be a phony; in 15 I was correcting my characterization of Daniel Pipes who called her theory 'alchemy' (my word 'phony') not herself the person. I openyl accepted the mistake unlike the WMDead Enders who are undermining the war effort.

The rest of your post is just sad spinning, but let me ask you this, Mylroie is out there on the lecture circuit telling people that the country went to war because Saddam was responsible for 9/11, which is contrary to not only the White House but most people's opinions on the subject.

Isn't it fair to say she is a loose cannon if not a little off the rocker if she believes that?

Again:

I think she is a phony for making money off those who died in the WTC, OKC, and 9/11. I think she is a phony for getting paid by the McVeigh Defense team to produce evidence, only the stuff she came up with was rejected by a court of law (the conspiracy grows, eh?) which in the meantime, by putting the focus on a foreign power, took the focus off whatever the hell was going on at Elohim City, Carol Howe and Andres Strassmeir.

[justshutupandtakeit]

It is very reassuring to find opponents of no higher credibility. If JG says it isn't so that is a good indicator that it IS.