[JohnGalt]

"adoption of a blind policy of isolationism as do you."

Where have I done this?

Your analysis of Washington is down right comedy but at least you bother to make the attempt to claim intellectual heritage from the fore fathers. Its clear you have no idea what you are talking about, but its a noble effort. Most of the neocons just lament about what would their hero FDR do?

[justshutupandtakeit]

Quite the contrary I know exactly what I am talking about which is far more than I can claim for many of my adversaries. I have studied the Farewell Address and its authors extensively and understand exactly what was the reason for Hamilton's writing of it. His fears (disUnion through duplicity and foreign corruption) mirrored those of Washington and his understanding of their domestic enemies' duplicity and treachery was the principle reason they swore to destroy him by any means necessary.

I note the entire lack of substantive thought in your irrelevent comment. A comment which ignores the truths stated, falling back into a minor-league mendacity without a glimmer of substance. The comment about FDR is typical red herring unrelated to anything I said as well as anything "neocons" believe. Must be nice to live within a world untouched by realities and fact.