Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
It most certainly is in question, only that is not the point.

Yousef may or may not have had something to do with the OKC bombing, but Yousef was not working for Iraq, as Mylroie theorizes.

Where do you think the Mylroie is right and Bodansky is wrong? Do you think Boudansky is a liar? < / sarcasm> I suspect at this point you have no idea who I am talking about.
134 posted on 01/08/2004 1:23:03 PM PST by JohnGalt ("the constitution as it is, the union as it was")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt
You really need to read The New Jackals. Yousef worked for anyone who helped him further his cause. Iraq. Pakistan. Iran.

He also attacked those countries. Iran because they held his father hostage. His hatred knows no bounds. He is considered the most dangerous prisoner in the US today.

I know who Bodansky is. I don't believe he is a liar. I just don't think he knows every single terrorist or everything having to do with the OKC bombing. He has not made it his life's work to find out about it, like many people have.
140 posted on 01/08/2004 1:43:24 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson