[spacewarp]

Actually, Sink, if he had been found innocent and the prosecutor, judge and IRS agents had performed this abuse, I'd still be calling for their heads. I'm not a tax protest lemming. Let me get it clear to you. I'm for a less abusive government. One in which ordinary citizens can have hope that they can perform their jobs, live their lives and while not harming anyone can continue to live life to it's fullest. Instead, you seem to be willing to put up wit government corruption, abuse and incompentence. And when someone calls you on it, you just call them a tax protester. If you would go back and read some of the prior comments, you'd understand that it's not the issue I'm angry about, but the treatment. Get over yourself. Sheesh. If you can't answer the question, just admit that you don't know what cases it was that "decided" this issue. I can understand "I don't know". But dodging is just plain cowardly.

[sinkspur]

One in which ordinary citizens can have hope that they can perform their jobs, live their lives and while not harming anyone can continue to live life to it's fullest.

Is exposing your employees to legal liability "not harming anyone"?

Instead, you seem to be willing to put up wit government corruption, abuse and incompentence. And when someone calls you on it, you just call them a tax protester.

Because all the people "calling me on it" on this thread ARE tax protesters.

Well, they're not actually tax protesters themselves, as they all probably pay their taxes and file returns. But, like the cowardly Bob Schulz, they cheer OTHER people when they take the advice of some derelict like Irwin Schiff and end up in federal prison for ten years.

You're angry about "the treatment"? Why should an outright scoundrel who, once again, exposed his very own employees to legal liability get special treatment?

If I were one of this guy's workers, he'd be lucky not to have both legs broken by now.