Skip to comments.
Taft to sign hidden gun bill
Tribune Chronicle ^
| 01-08-04
| JOHN McCARTHY The Associated Press
Posted on 01/08/2004 4:17:45 AM PST by MissTargets
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Finally after years of hard work. Thanks to OFCC, the NRA, and especially all the grass roots citizens, who worked so hard to get this passed.
To: *bang_list; Deadeye Division
Great News!
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
41 |
United Kingdom |
100.00
|
1
|
100.00
|
128
|
0.78
|
30.00
|
1
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
To: MissTargets
However, it stalled in the House because of opposition from Republican Gov. George Voinovich and then-Speaker Jo Ann Davidson, a suburban Columbus Republican. Two other bills died under Davidson.
Figures. Voinovich is such a loser.
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: William Creel
It sounds to be more of Davidson's fault.
Perhaps. But if you watch George V's antics in congress, you'll see he's as much a RINO as she might be. Taft's not much better, but at least he'll sign the bill.
To: William Creel
Taft fought it pretty hard himself, and was personally responible for adding some hoops. Of course now he'll probably run for congress as a gun rights supporter.
7
posted on
01/08/2004 4:42:57 AM PST
by
steve50
("There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.")
To: MissTargets
The bill also makes the names of permit holders in each county available to reporters who ask a sheriff's department for the names. Good! These should be published weekly in the major city newspapers, under the heading "Don't Try to Rob or Rape US!"
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: MissTargets
Taft to sign hidden gun billLet's just make this sound a little more ominous, shall we? Will you get a "hidden gun" permit? No, you we get a Concealed Carry Permit.
Hidden guns are what criminals have. Law abiding citizens have CCW's.
10
posted on
01/08/2004 5:14:12 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: ClintonBeGone
He predicted that proponents of gun rights would chip away at the bill, especially the public records and background check provisions.Yes, because we all know this has happened in the other 37 states that allow CCW. Along with the usual blood flowing in the streets like the old west. NOT!
11
posted on
01/08/2004 5:16:19 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: MissTargets
No, it's a bad idea.
In North Carolina this law was used by reporters to expose the names and addresses of all gunowners in the state in an anti-gun hit piece.
12
posted on
01/08/2004 5:18:06 AM PST
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: steve50
Taft fought it pretty hard himself, and was personally responible for adding some hoops. Of course now he'll probably run for congress as a gun rights supporter. The only reason he is going to sign it, is because it is veto proof, the legislature wants it overwelmingly. Taft is still very much an anti-gun liberal.
To: waterstraat
Taft is still very much an anti-gun liberal.I doubt we've seen the last of him in the political arena. He's the type republican the RNC seems to like anymore. Wish they'd get their nose out of state politics
14
posted on
01/08/2004 5:48:41 AM PST
by
steve50
("There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.")
To: Puppage
Hidden guns are what criminals have.I didn't care for their choice of words, in the headline either.
A real negative spin.
To: The Red Zone
The bill also makes the names of permit holders in each county available to reporters who ask a sheriff's department for the names.I cannot imagine reporters just running down to the local sheriff's office for the name of permit holders. Unless someone is arrested, detainted for whatever reason. Then they might check. Even if the offense does not have anything to do with a CCW permit, I am sure it will be published.
My feelings on this infomation is mixed. We will see how it plays out.
To: waterstraat
Now why can't some of that be imported into Illinois.
To: Maelstrom
In North Carolina this law was used by reporters to expose the names and addresses of all gunowners in the state in an anti-gun hit piece.That is a concern of mine. With all the opposition to this bill, and how long it took to get passed, there just might be a problem, with the access to the list of permit holders.
To: Shooter 2.5
Taft said he looked forward to signing the bill.Yeah, right. Only because of threat of veto overide. But, we finally got it. Now to go gun shopping. :)
To: MissTargets
After a few years, the more onerous restrictions should be removed once lawmakers see Ohio isn't being turned into a "Wild West" shooting gallery. The enemy of the good is insistence upon perfect. Do those of us who support CCW like everything about this bill? Of course not - but with Bob Taft, its as good as we're going to get. We have fights ahead in Missouri, Kansas and Nebraska.
20
posted on
01/08/2004 7:02:39 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson