I agree with you. As a matter of fact, I enjoy a good rough and tumble exchange of ideas now and then. I don't even mind the name calling because that just proves that I've won the debate. The only time anyone resorts to name calling is when they can't defend their position.
|
You've apprently never studied the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
Great ideas and solutions are frequently forged in the heat of rancorous, sometimes personal, even highly unpleasant disagreement. If the matter at hand is important enough, if it is vital enough, it is almost certain generate this heat.
Beware the idea-barren tyranny of conflict-avoidance favored by mewling mediocre minds.
True. This is why is said I enjoy rough and tumble exchange of ideas. But your point is correct though because when the name calling starts I get bored and move on.
Sabertooth,
Those words struck a chord in me.
I have stayed away from the illegal alien threads for that very reason.
In the spirit of what you wrote above, I've had the following quote on my FR profile page for a long time now:
"The slaves of power mind the cause they have to serve, because their own interest is concerned; but the friends of liberty always sacrifice their cause, which is only the cause of humanity, to their own spleen, vanity, and self-opinion."
- William Hazlitt (1778 - 1830)
All the best to you.
CD
One of the most disappoint exchanges I had was the other day on one of Pubbie's threads. He seems to think that because he started it and decided to label it 'activisism' it was somehow immune from question. Those are not the seeds of good debate.
I can't buy this. That tactic can succeed only if others take the bait. When I see someone, as the mod put it, "primed for a pissing contest", I retire wordlessly. That response is 100% guaranteed to render flame baiters ineffective. Who the hell wants to talk to an 8-year-old mind?