Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: glannon; hchutch; Lead Moderator
they allowed the members to vote to cull them.\

After they were listed as "finalists."

is that so bad, that they democratized these editorial decisions?

In this case, yes.

They really didn't think it was beyond the pale until they got caught.

i can see it was risky -- their members might have picked these clearly embarassing ads. but in this case the risk worked out for them: their members rejected the ads.

You strike me as a MoveOn apologist. Nothing they do can be wrong.

Moderator, possible troll, Aisle 1052683...

39 posted on 01/06/2004 11:45:20 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
You strike me as a MoveOn apologist. Nothing they do can be wrong.

actually i said it was risky to allow people to choose what i called 'embarassing ads'. that would have been wrong. moveon members did the right thing: they rejected the ads.

46 posted on 01/06/2004 11:51:55 AM PST by glannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson