To: Viking2002
It would seem that British denial knows no end. They're still referring to it as the "landing" site.
Sure.
7 posted on
01/06/2004 10:54:37 AM PST by
SJSAMPLE
To: SJSAMPLE
If this is all they have, then any possibility no matter how remote has to be explored.
Is it possible for an orbiting satelite to take a picture of the potential "splat" site? (is it possible they used the rejected rover parachutes?)
I think it would be just as important to know why it failed.
To: SJSAMPLE
"My bet is that during the landing phase, one of the steps did not go as planned," If he's right, I hate it when that happens.
A step not going as planned, that is. Not the bet.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson