Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Naspino
Ah I get it. Its the reverse argument we're making. Instead of "if you don't want to be searched don't fly" -- you are saying "if you don't want to get blown up -- don't fly"?

I've read that now six times, and frankly I have no idea what it is you're trying say. Try again? The only thing I can offer is this, in a Constitutional Republic, the feds have to have a warrant to search me, re: the 4th Amd. I wouldn't fly today if you put a loaded gun to my head. I have no fear of terrorist, none what so ever. If the rest of you lazy bums want to be subject's, knock yourself out. Don't attempt to take my right's away, you'll find that a rough road to travel. Blackbird.

176 posted on 01/06/2004 11:22:42 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: BlackbirdSST
You said you don't understand. The question posed to you was "so then all luggage searches at airport check-in violate the 4th amendment too?" and you answered "If done by Federal Employee's, YES. Do they have a warrant to search?"

That would mean you are opposed to security searches as airports which is the equivalent of surrendering our airports to the terrorists. So instead of our arguement "if you don't want to be searched then don't fly" -- yours would appear to be "if you don't want to be blown up don't fly".

182 posted on 01/06/2004 11:33:16 AM PST by Naspino (Exodus 22: 28 Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson