Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GmbyMan
Bush is a good moral man, unlike the cad who pre-dated his term.

However, Bush did not propose, though he delivered a key piece of the Hillarycare package. If he is not a socialist, I am not sure what definition you are using.
79 posted on 01/06/2004 9:07:05 AM PST by JohnGalt ("Nothing happened on 9/11 to make the federal government more competent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt
Socialism is when the workers own the means of production. In this day and age, socialism has also come to mean when the government owns the means of production (which is really communism) but doesn't run a police state. The biggest problem that I see with with Bush is that he has been complicit in *helping* the business owners to provide them cover from making bad business moves. This is not socialism, this is soft corporatism (which I also don't like). Go ask any union boss if Bush is helping the workers control the means of production.
82 posted on 01/06/2004 9:10:25 AM PST by GmbyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson