To: JohnGalt
Blindly ignoring the socialist apology
Strip off the flowery loaded rhetoric, and you could just say that he's more interested in US foreign policy than in domestic policy, and that the poster was discussing the concepts explained by the author, rather than the ones he didn't. Funny, doesn't sound so evil that way.
I do my darndest to respond to everyone who posts to me so that the ideological black and white types who showed up on this site last March to cheer on the Armageddon realize that there is an actual debate here and maybe they should read a book and turn off the soft porn magnate's news program.
Gosh, you sure like to make uninformed assumptions.
127 posted on
01/06/2004 11:28:25 AM PST by
adam_az
To: adam_az
I have no argument with RINOs writing articles, its just strange that those with low self-esteem, so anxious for applause from the peanut gallery, can't honestly digest and consider whether the support of the author is worth celebrating.
And what assumptions are you referring to? Fox News is considered a conservative news source on this web site, that seemed pretty safe, and Alexa.com provides the evidence that much of FR's traffic particularly last spring, was click overs from CBN and the 700 Club which routinely used Armageddonist rhetoric in describing the nature of the Iraq War.
131 posted on
01/06/2004 11:34:33 AM PST by
JohnGalt
("How few were left who had seen the Republic!"- Tacitus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson