To: ETERNAL WARMING
Essentially, employees would be working more hours for the same pay.
And boy will that make the US productivity numbers look great.
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
50 |
Wyoming |
20.00
|
1
|
20.00
|
26
|
0.77
|
30.00
|
1
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
To: ETERNAL WARMING
Without the EMPLOYER, the EMPLOYEE wouldn't have a job to begin with. The EMPLOYER decides what the EMPLOYEE is worth, not the other way around. If the EMPLOYEE doesn't like it, he/she doesn't have to work for said, EMPLOYER. It's not that hard to understand.
If the EMPLOYEE is worth more, I would suggest that MANY EMPLOYERS will be more than happy to pay EMPLOYEE the requested amount.
I'm sure the UNION BOSSES are making less than almost all of the EMPLOYEES. /sarcasm
4 posted on
01/05/2004 11:59:37 PM PST by
kcvl
To: ETERNAL WARMING
Pure crap and mostly lies.
The IRS has strict rules on who can be declared "exempt" from overtime laws. They are usually ignored for higher paid "white collar workers" who are paid salary regardless of the rules. Not blue collar, hourly workers.
These are typical lies printed in the press that distort or ignore the facts. It's like the lies about arsenic in the water, Halliburton, "imminent threat", yellow cake from Niger, cut in combat pay, cuts in veteran benefits, etc.
8 posted on
01/06/2004 1:08:18 AM PST by
Fledermaus
(Howard Dean is insane. And the "mainstream press" are his enablers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson