To: SevenDaysInMay
Bush's abdication of his responsibility to defend our sovereign borders OR his active conspiracy to nullify our sovereign borders and rule of law is a direct violation of his oath of office.This is very clear.
153 posted on
01/05/2004 9:16:04 PM PST by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: Joe Hadenuf
Clear as mud.
To: Joe Hadenuf; SevenDaysInMay
"Bush's abdication of his responsibility to defend our sovereign borders OR his active conspiracy to nullify our sovereign borders and rule of law is a direct violation of his oath of office."SDIM
This is very clear.
I've been wondering just what, if anything, is grounds for high treason these days. Seems that our government officials can knowingly allow our Military/Technology Secrets to fall into the hands of our enemies and get away with it. Our government officials can encourage other nations to invade America with impunity, force Americans to pay for the staggering social welfare costs of the Invaders and let them take our jobs. They can encourage American-based companies to outsource American jobs to other nations. I mean the list just goes on and on.
What falls under Treason today? What's Left?
193 posted on
01/05/2004 9:53:28 PM PST by
WRhine
To: Joe Hadenuf; SevenDaysInMay
I contemplated throwing a flag on the "active conspiracy" part of that reply. It would help if we kept things relatively sane with our rhetoric. I decided to not say anything though, allowing for a bit of hyperbole.
Seeing you pick it up and echo it, Joe, convinced me to throw the flag.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson