[daylate-dollarshort]

Just as I posted above.

It has nothing to do with "I guess it's too big a case for him to let go of, considering the implications of the case and the agenda of the court as seen by Baird's prejudicial comments before getting the case." Judge Baird has already heard the case!!

Cases are NEVER turned over to a new judge once they have been heard or are in the process of being heard.

There is nothing extrordinary going on here....

[msmagoo]

"Cases are NEVER turned over to a new judge once they have been heard or are in the process of being heard." 1. Never say NEVER. 2. Misconduct is sufficient reason to remove the case from Baird's control. 3. Baird made his opinion public, before hearing both sides of the case...of course he wants to retain control, so he can tailor his verdict to support the flawed rationale of the Pinellas County hacks who distorted the law and ignored evidence in the first place.