[doug from upland]

I don't like it when anyone on our side uses a Nazi analogy to the other side. If people today are called Nazis, what word is left to adequately describe Hitler and his followers --- supernazis? In sports, we used to understand the term "star." Then, they had to go to superstar. From there, it became true superstar.

[Sender]

Not only is the comparison of Bush to Hitler ridiculously inappropriate, even for those who hate Bush, but the hardcore left seem to be internalizing these kinds of grandiose, nuclear put-downs to the point that they now are certifiably insane.

For instance, just a few months ago if a lefty had been confronted about a Bush-Hitler quip, and challenged whether Bush had tried to commit genocide and tortured and starved millions of people, he/she would have slunk away mumbling. But today, these intellectual giants on the left have repeated their own lies and whoppers to themselves until they can't tell truth from political invective.

Just today, on 'that other website', there are threads about just this comparison. More and more of them are now saying 'no, Bush hasn't killed 6 million people or committed bizarre medical experiments on twins yet, but give him time, he will. Hitler also started out small. The comparison is completely appropriate'

As much as the left's collective psychosis disturbs me, if they continue on this bizarre path, conservatives should have an easy time getting reelected in 2004.