For example, you state "it against their interest to vote with the BCS." Even if this is true, it hardly establishes "corruption."
But I am aware of little to no evidence that it is true. Historically, the two systems have tended to produce a single winner. They typically produce a split decision only in years (like this one) in which there are two teams with identical loss records and very similar levels of accomplishment. In other words, when there are good and legitimate (i.e., non-"corrupt") grounds for splitting the title of "national champion."
You also argue that the AP sportswriter's poll is flawed because the AP's political reporting is flawed. ("Are you defending the AP writers? They picked Gore, Dean, Hussein, Bin Laden, Abortion on Demand, more taxes, universal health care. I can't think of an issue they got right."). But the one rather obviously has nothing to do with the other.
You also claim that the AP surpresses the results of sportswriters' polls "they" disagree with. ("[T]hey show their bias in the polls they REVEAL. Imagine, the ones you can't see."). In the absence of hard evidence that the AP has ever surpressed any poll results, that is tinfoil-hat-ism of the most paranoid kind. If you have evidence, I would be interested in seeing it.
Ultimately, in the absence of a head to head matchup, the issue of which team is "national champion" is simply a matter of opinion. As a conservative, I will stick with the long-established and accepted "two poll system" for that determination.
Congratulations to LSU, the BCS national champion. And congratulations to USC, the AP national champion.