To: Jarhead_22
his appearance is different, that's why there is no video.
9 posted on
01/04/2004 12:40:00 PM PST by
oceanview
To: oceanview
My question, wasn't the next tape supposed to coincide with "planned" attack?
10 posted on
01/04/2004 12:41:17 PM PST by
nwctwx
To: oceanview
his appearance is different, that's why there is no video.
67 posted on
01/04/2004 1:11:41 PM PST by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: oceanview
his appearance is different, that's why there is no video.
101 posted on
01/04/2004 1:50:14 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
("...the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.")
To: oceanview
[bin Laden's] appearance is different, that's why there is no video.
That would explain why they're never seen together.
135 posted on
01/04/2004 2:13:53 PM PST by
Kevin Curry
("Mean Dean, he's obscene, he gets drunk on gasoline" Howie's childhood taunt)
To: oceanview
"his appearance is different, that's why there is no video." I agree! What's interesting is that everyone wants absolute proof that Bin Laden is alive (i.e. OBL holding recent newpaper clipping). I think it is to his advantage to keep everyone guessing about whether he's alive or not (plus it keeps his "new" appearance a secret, as suggested above). Many are convinced that OBL is alive. I am not one of them. OBL had too much time to make his escape before we bombed Afghanistan (if he even was there in the months prior to our attack).
To: oceanview
And the jiblowhards have been bragging that the next video tape of usama will be shown after their next lethal attack on the U.S. Supposedly anyway....
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson