Skip to comments.
US Girls Embrace Gay Passion Fashion (Barf Alert)
The Guardian Unlimited ^
| Sunday January 4, 2004
| Richard Luscombe
Posted on 01/04/2004 6:22:51 AM PST by EsclavoDeCristo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
The 'chic chick on chick' phenomenon seems to be particularly prevalent at teenage and college parties, where it is common to find two or more girls kissing each other, often egged on by a rowdy, supportive group of males. ' Wow, that sure is sexual freedom for a woman. Just do what the guys think is cool (sarcasm off). Its like a girl flashing her boobs and saying that it's 'sexual freedom' and being proud of her boob flashing 'talent.' In my opinion, it's just one more way for women to degrade themselves into objects instead of people. And we've got these gay advocates promoting this sort of crap. God Bless America!
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
17 |
Mississippi |
220.00
|
2
|
110.00
|
106
|
2.08
|
30.00
|
3
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
To: EsclavoDeCristo
I thought people were born queer. it sure doesnt look that way.
3
posted on
01/04/2004 6:29:27 AM PST
by
sgtbono2002
(I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
To: EsclavoDeCristo
I wonder if part of the reason is because there are fewer real men today.
Most young men today are whimps compared to those a generation ago. Most young men today are not in the military, are not in college(women far outnumber men in college), do not have higher paying jobs, do not know what chivalry or being a gentleman means, do not race cars nor handle guns, are not religous and political conservatives, and todays males spend more of their time and money on clothes than females used to. (I am not talking about males being crude, or dirty, lots of today's sissy males are still crude and dirty).
To: waterstraat
We can thank the feminazi's and the sexual revolution for this. Men have been put down so much in our society for just being men that they can't win. I personally find a man who knows how to use a gun much more attactive than a man who knows how to use a blow dryer.
To: waterstraat
They are called stoners.
6
posted on
01/04/2004 6:49:00 AM PST
by
Vaduz
To: LoudRepublicangirl
You sound ike my wife.[thats a good thing]
7
posted on
01/04/2004 7:09:34 AM PST
by
JOHANNES801
(WHEN THE 2ND IS REPEALED,THE 2ND REVOLUTION STARTS.)
To: LoudRepublicangirl
I have over 30 guns but not 1 blow dryer.
8
posted on
01/04/2004 7:11:02 AM PST
by
JOHANNES801
(WHEN THE 2ND IS REPEALED,THE 2ND REVOLUTION STARTS.)
To: LoudRepublicangirl
'It's a bisexuality that's focused on heterosexuality, in that it's still focused on pleasing a man, and in that sense it's not progressive,' Gilliam said. < sarcasm>FemiNazis are not satisfied until the object of any action is to deliberately exclude men.</ sarcasm>
9
posted on
01/04/2004 7:15:02 AM PST
by
glorgau
To: LoudRepublicangirl
Men have been put down so much in our society for just being men that they can't win. I dont think many of them today are even trying to win. Not only are they more whimpy, but young men today are less gentlemanly and less respectfull of women. There has been no "trade-off" at all, young men are not nicer than the men of yesterday.
Lots of similarlities can be made with todays republicans who try to "out democrat" the Democrats, but yet they are even more "uncaring" than the real repubicans of the old days. Not only was Reagan more conservative than bush, but I think he truely cared more about the personal well being of the average american worker than bush does.
To: EsclavoDeCristo
Oregon student Toby Hill-Meyer, who is researching how people define their sexuality, said that, because of the so-called bisexual chic, genuine bisexuals are turning away from the word.What is a "genuine bisexual"?
11
posted on
01/04/2004 7:24:37 AM PST
by
scan58
To: waterstraat
I wonder if part of the reason is because there are fewer real men today.Yes --- what would be the real difference between a metrosexual and another girl?
12
posted on
01/04/2004 7:24:41 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: EsclavoDeCristo
Really it looks more that this is another example of girls being so hard up to catch a boyfriend they'll kiss other girls if they think it makes a guy notice them --- that's not really gay, that's being desperate for a man.
13
posted on
01/04/2004 7:26:11 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: waterstraat
Can you totally blame men for the current situation? That women outnumber men in college is hardly men's fault. And college isn't exactly guy friendly. Male professors prefer female students. And female professors prefer female students.
Workforce is the same thing. Not our fault. For at least 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week, men are asked not to see women as women. But women can still wear their war paint and short skirts for those 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week.
Chivalry doesn't exist mainly because women are nothing to be chivalrous over anymore. The virtuous women vanished before the chivalrous man.
14
posted on
01/04/2004 7:37:38 AM PST
by
34512a
To: sgtbono2002
Well, well. It seems the queers want to have it both ways: "homosexuals are born that way" but straights should "experiment with alternative sexuality". Eventually, if straights are the least bit clever, the homosexuals' propaganda will go so far towards ecouraging experimentation as a way of recruiting, we'll be able to establish scientifically that it's not inborn (perhaps save for very few). Then, as mores shift back, we can blow through the scientific psychological BS they've used as a shield and put them back in the closet: forbidding homosexual contact with children in any form and punishing seduction of same sex youth with castration and incarceration.
15
posted on
01/04/2004 7:37:55 AM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
To: CatoRenasci
'It's a bisexuality that's focused on heterosexuality, in that it's still focused on pleasing a man, and in that sense it's not progressive,' Gilliam said. Yes --- it looks like they actually are trying to push more people into becoming gay. Progressive???
16
posted on
01/04/2004 7:50:25 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: LoudRepublicangirl
We can thank the feminazi's and the sexual revolution for this. We each have freewill and freedom to choose. Sin isn't a new thing. When parents "know not God" or fail to teach their children His precepts, this and worse will be the result. Sad thing is that when that day comes, when "every knee shall bow", ignorance will not be an acceptable excuse. Our children will learn something as they grow. Remember Britney said her mom thought kissing Madonna was a cool thing...evidently some other moms and kiddos felt the same.
17
posted on
01/04/2004 8:03:44 AM PST
by
LucyJo
To: FITZ
Eirst of all, as someone once said: A "bisexual" is a gay without a press agent.
In my experience, I would put the number of woman who are, to some degree, sexually attracted to other woman at about 10%, easily!
I would guess that this whole thing is fueled mostly by girls who ARE interested in other girls sexually. Add in a few who aren't relating what they are doing(at the moment, check in with them the morning after!) to their self image. In other words: they are just "kidding" around.
The bottom line is that humans will pretty much do what feels good and if there WEREN'T some internal bar to homo behavior it wouldn't be stigmatized. How often in recorded human history has there been a society that viewed sex as a General thing genarally indulged in?
18
posted on
01/04/2004 8:08:50 AM PST
by
TalBlack
("Tal, no song means anything without someone else...")
To: EsclavoDeCristo
This tatoo will be with them a long time. I only regret bell bottoms.
19
posted on
01/04/2004 8:23:04 AM PST
by
ditto h
To: waterstraat
---but young men today are less gentlemanly and less respectfull of women.
You are right, however most of todays "womyn" (I just like the way that looks in print) are deserving of nothing but contempt.
20
posted on
01/04/2004 8:43:18 AM PST
by
BudgieRamone
(Unapologetically Male: I eat, sleep, shoot, drink, use power tools, and water my herbs & orchids :))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson