To: Reagan Man
Yes, you did change your argument. You first claimed discretionary spending was down in Reagan's first 3 years- in fact it increased from 5-6%, depending on whose chart you look at. It's irrelevant that he made some cuts here or there, as Bush has done the same, because in aggregate discretionary spending increased.
46 posted on
01/04/2004 2:51:22 PM PST by
jagrmeister
(I'm not a conservative. I don't seek to conserve, I seek to reform.)
To: jagrmeister
You said and I quote:
"Cutting spending is a political impossibility. Reagan could not do it".The facts speak for themselves. Reagan cut federal spending and there is nothing irrelevent about that. You've been proven wrong. End of discussion.
47 posted on
01/04/2004 3:44:35 PM PST by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson