Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hellinahandcart
Oh sheesh, never mind, I see what you mean. (slapping self)

Slap me...I still don't get it!
127 posted on 01/03/2004 9:03:04 AM PST by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: hummingbird
You'd have had to be here when the thread first went up, it was a little different then.

To sum up, I Am Not A Mod, who is actually one of the Mods, posted the original article with the title "Do Not Post Images From Rotten.com".

G.Mason, in #8, immediately posted, from rotten.com, a picture of Michael Jackson, which was received with general merriment.

Lead Moderator then replied to G.Mason "Just wait and see what happens when we leave it up".

When Lead Moderator pinged me and others in #80, I thought it was to tell us that the switch had been made and some dreadful image was now on view at #8. In other words, to look quick before it had to be taken down. I still saw Michael Jackson. 8^P

But the ping was to notify us of modifications to the article body. The rotten.com image was posted there (now it's only a link to the picture) and the title had changed to something like "Do Not Post Images From Rotten.com (WARNING: Gross Picture on Thread)". I didn't notice that, or think to look at the article again, so that's how I got confused.

I'm still kind of waiting to see what Michael Jackson's picture changes into.


145 posted on 01/03/2004 9:51:33 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson