Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hadrian
There is another way to look at it. They supposedly have specific intel that a certain individual on the flight might be a terrorist. Yet they are going to let him board, but place an armed man on the plane to shoot him if he trips on his way to the restroom.

If I were the pilot under the circumstances, I would cancel the flight.
69 posted on 01/02/2004 9:33:56 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marron
What is the down side to that scenario?
70 posted on 01/02/2004 9:39:32 PM PST by eastforker (The color of justice is green,just ask Johny Cochran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: marron
actually, fox had an el al security person tonight who said that was exactly what should be done. place squads on the flights and intercept the event. I don't think I am in favor of that, because all that has to happen is for the bomber to get into the lavatory and its game over. that scenario may work with regards to a hijack attempt, but not a bomber.
78 posted on 01/02/2004 10:05:00 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson